" Not everyone on the call agreed with your rant "
whatever you want to classify it as get used to it...I will state upfront what I'm thinking. Like I said I don't dance around hypotheticals if I have a real situation in my mind...your singling out FC didn't make any sense to me since you didn't have any evidence it was them selling. You posted it here and again during the call. Neither place did it make sense so my 'rant' was to let you know that but like I said get used to it.
"but please accept that I analyze in a different manner than you do... "
I do and that's why when you post I only select portions of your post and ignore the rest to respond to because you do look at things VERY DIFFERENT from me. Nothing wrong with that. You put your $$$'s on the table and you want results. I put my $$$'s on the table and I want results. Our difference is how we perceive the company to get there. Nothing wrong with that either.
"5) Do you think a Reverse Split is in the cards for the next 3 years, if you had to guess?"
I don't have to guess. It was discussed during one of the conference calls by Jim. He said he had options, reverse split was one, he mentioned he owned most of the shares and could return to treasury some of them
"2) Your current thoughts on whom the big seller COULD be, if you don't answer this, answer whether you think they are closely tied to the company, some way somehow?"
don't have a clue...but the company mentioned in last week's conversation they either knew or thought they knew
"4) Will they need to raise additional cash at the current burn rates? If so, what is your projection?"
again, don't have a clue. This is March, 1st week....there's almost 10 months left to this year and a bunch of balls bouncing up in the air waiting to land....