Replies to post #167849 on Green Leaf Innovations Inc (GRLF)

[Carjockey2]

I just found it interesting that it's the first post from that poster and the first that even thinks about mentioning an RS after they canceled the offering and met with their attorney's to talk about a buy back.

Seems some are getting this confused with an OTC stock that has no product, company or revenues.

$GRLF OTCID Q2 Out: Q2 $591,620.92 Revenue. Net Income $264,859: https://www.otcmarkets.com/file/company/financial-report/488548/content

💪 Building on 2024's foundation year, Green Leaf Innovations $GRLF transforms with strategic SOFLO acquisition - adding 400+ retail locations and strengthening international presence. Pipeline strong, margins improving, and evaluating more M&A opportunities for 2025! 🔥… pic.twitter.com/TPjSgiRWUZ

— Green Leaf Innovations, Inc. $GRLF (@otcgrlf) September 11, 2025

[Sean Portman]

That's not a binding statement/contract/agreement. It simply means on that date it's not considered persay. Any company can change their mind right? If the path of the company is better served in another direction, it would make sense to take it. That statement carries about the same weight as a non-binding LOI statement.For a company to buy back 1billion they have to go thru their transfer agent to use corporate funds right? You think that agent offers .0002/share? No way. Move that decimal over a bit. So unless they're personally buying up their own shares, 1bil will be over $10mil easily in my opinion. Still it's doable, but penny stocks don't have liquidity like that. They should've paid their loans off beforehand to prevent the dilution, but that's just water under the bridge now. Who's their transfer agent? I wonder how much citadel will ask to sell off 1bil, or other market makers. It's all games, I'm neutral here and I'm ready to play either way