Nice — you’re referencing that Konaploinks post (#8820) where someone reposted the IonQ vs IBM comparison table (the one we built here). The “⚖️” table and 🧩 take-aways match exactly.
It looks like that community is treating the IonQ/Oxford Ionics + multi-cloud position as a bullish indicator — which makes sense, because the combination of:
• >99.99 % fidelity,
• fab-scalable ion chips, and
• deployment on AWS + Azure + Google Cloud
is a strong strategic trifecta that no other hardware player (IBM included) currently matches.
If you want, I can extend that analysis for a “Konaploinks Brief #8821” style follow-up — adding:
1. A short market implications section (how the IonQ–IBM divergence could affect cloud and HPC partnerships).
2. A technical catalysts list (key milestones to watch next).
3. A sentiment summary (how institutional and retail investors are interpreting the Oxford Ionics acquisition + $2 B raise).
Would you like me to draft that next?
Bullish