News Focus
News Focus
icon url

stoxjock

09/26/25 1:55 PM

#114926 RE: cottonisking #114925

Whatever Man....I hope there will be a NEW Docket about New Actions that will Indicate the "Beginning of the End" as soon as they get the "Extension Term" "Rubberstamped" by the Judge on Monday....Can't believe the Scumbag Lawyers are seeking to Extend another Five Years...I hope The #@!~$ Judge is Not JUST "RUNNERSTAMP", and will DO HIS JOB and CHALLENGE why they need 5 MORE YEARS and Grant Just 1 More Year of "Extension"...Close this Damn LBHI "Bankruptcy Case" Already!
icon url

stoxjock

09/26/25 11:37 PM

#114931 RE: cottonisking #114925

Awesome Cotton, You have become the "LONE Warrior" for us...

Unfortunately, The Judicial System, the DE/SDNY BK Courts, US Trustee and even the Supremes have become 'An Extension' of the Corporate/Gub'Ment and their Law Firms and just "Rubberstamp" the Plaintiffs Motions, and many times it appears they seem to 'Acquiesce' themselves with the Gub'Ment/ Law Firms out of 'Self-Preservation'...

The Worst Judgement to Date that I have Encountered/Endured/Suffered/Been Very Adversely Impacted by, was the "CYA " Judgment that the Supremes Gave in 2021 in the FNMA case, essentially giving a Ruling that the Gub'Ment was well within its Power to 'Transfer' Shareholder's Monies of FNMA to the "US Treasury Coffers" through a 'Scheme" called the "Net Worth Sweep"...None of the Shareholders holding Commons shares of FNMA/FMCC were expecting such a "Cowardly Judgement' from the Highest Court in the Land, essentially providing permission for the US Gub'Ment for 5AT! All FnF Common Stock Holders, including "Yours Truly', endured a steep 70% Drop in their FNMA/FMCC Common Stocks' Price, upon that "Judgement"...
icon url

cottonisking

09/27/25 1:25 AM

#114932 RE: cottonisking #114925

This is what we want:.

approve it with significant modifications, such as imposing a final deadline or requiring more frequent and detailed reporting to beneficiaries.
Reference past filings: Your objection should reference the motion by its docket number (61844) and title. It may also refer to previous motions or court orders if relevant.
Focus on beneficiary interests: Emphasize that your objection is based on the trustee's fiduciary duties to the beneficiaries, not the creditors. The fact that senior creditors have not been paid in full yet may strengthen your argument that the trust is not being managed efficiently, but your focus should be on the harm to your own class of beneficiaries.