News Focus
News Focus
icon url

arizona1

09/16/25 1:42 AM

#544640 RE: Lime Time #544638

Plus this is a free board.

Do you know why?
icon url

Hanibal

09/16/25 1:45 AM

#544642 RE: Lime Time #544638

You contribute nothing to this board. You just come here to troll, post racist bullshit and then have the gall to act upset when people push back against your bigoted vomit. Your first post today was just a video obviously intended to "trigger the libs". So spare me your "woe is me" soliloquy.

You wasted no time with this post too, being racist, imitating Kirk and showing your bigoted colors. We can say that we don't care Kirk is dead just like Kirk said that he doesn't care George Floyd is dead. Floyd was murdered by a cop and both you and Kirk reduced his life to lies about an overdose.

Facts are Kirk was a small minded bigot who attacked those weaker than him. He doesn't deserve to be remembered as if he wasn't. I have no problem with telling the truth about him. This whitewashing of his vile character y'all are doing is just sick.

I'll tell you something else. I'll call you a racist bigot to your face every time I see you post here. If you don't like it there's the door.
icon url

dinogreeves

09/16/25 1:53 AM

#544644 RE: Lime Time #544638

hey jack ass, If I were you, I will pay for Trump board, at least you will have a great conscious supporting your belief, go over there, they need you there. Short arm fucker.
icon url

blackhawks

09/16/25 9:38 AM

#544655 RE: Lime Time #544638

It's been accurately pointed out here that many who post here have been banned from conservative boards which proves two things; conservative boards exist on iHub and the intolerance towards those who disagree with righty points of view are enforced by permanent bans from posting.

You throw around the words 'freedom of speech' as though social media boards are required to provide it. They're not, GOVERNMENT is prohibited from interfering with it, save for certain exceptions.

Common misconceptions about free speech
It is important to understand that many forms of speech, even if offensive, are legally protected. Hate speech itself is not a standalone exception and is protected unless it falls into one of the unprotected categories. The First Amendment restricts government actions, not those of private entities like social media platforms. Additionally, the government can impose reasonable, content-neutral time, place, and manner restrictions on speech for reasons like public safety.


Charlie Kirk was not innocent of the things he has been quoted for and his 'family man' status does not shield him from legitimate criticism for his words and actions.

Here is a list of his most noxious and moronic statements. https://ca.news.yahoo.com/youre-wondering-charlie-kirk-believed-130017574.html

George Floyd WAS a criminal rightly adjudicated as such. Chauvin and the 3 other cops present were rightfully fired and convicted of state and federal charges for their roles in Floyd's murder.
icon url

fuagf

09/18/25 6:44 PM

#544972 RE: Lime Time #544638

Lime Time, Your post is chockablock with misinformation.

Moderation of this board basically has not changed for two decades plus. Your suggestion that more free speech is allowed here because iHub is hurting is claptrap straight from your ass. You have no basis at all for saying it. Then you obviously don't know this is a free board because one, the previous moderator F6(Mark) paid a lot of money to have it that way and two, because after the money Mark paid ran out admin. guessing at least partly because of Mark's contribution to iHub so in honor of his wishes and his memory, decided to leave it a free board. Then your saying this website is left leaning when there are so many rightwing political boards on the site from which many of us are permanently banned makes that comment of yours rubbish.

Kirk was a bigoted racist


https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=176716687

who said all speech including hate speech should be protected by the First Amendment:

Trump and his top officials have changed their tone on free speech. Here’s what they said earlier and now.
[...]
This promise to use the government’s power to police speech stands in contrast to Americans’ rights as espoused by Mr. Kirk himself, who emphasized that all speech, no matter how offensive .. .. , was protected by the First Amendment. But while the White House has argued that there is a difference between free speech and speech celebrating violence, the calls for retaliation are at odds with views the president and his advisers uttered only months — or in one case, one day — before. Here are how the views of Mr. Trump and top officials in his administration have changed, in their own words.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=176716803

"It wasn't up until recently, I've decided to post here again. The moderator(s) would ban and suppress opposing viewpoints for years. iHub is hurting for the views so the freedom of speech is now allowed here. Plus this is a free board. Most if not all of the pro Trump boards are subscription only members. I'll never pay for this website. It's a left leaning free talk about left wing politics all you want, but the lone admin has a bias against the conservative posters. You guys are allowed to say that you are happy that Charlie Kirk is dead even though he was innocent and a Christian family man, but we aren't allowed to say that George Floyd was a criminal, rightly stopped and convicted. A druggie and a law abuser."

Yours there is fiction. While it is not surprising to see you post it you should appreciate It reflects very poorly on you for basically one reason. There is not a fucking iota of truth in it.