News Focus
News Focus
icon url

blackhawks

08/21/25 12:15 AM

#540302 RE: janice shell #540298

Whomp, wait, what's the other side of the story? And which side do you think will carry the AI day?

What are the main reasons most AI pilots don't impact company profits significantly?

ChatGPT said:

Good question — it comes up a lot in management discussions. Most AI “pilots” (small-scale test projects) don’t translate into significant profit impact, even when the technology works, for a few recurring reasons:

1. Pilots focus on experimentation, not scale.

Pilots are usually designed to prove feasibility, not to deliver enterprise-wide value.

They often run on small datasets or narrow use cases that don’t touch enough of the business to move the financial needle.

2. Lack of integration into workflows.

AI pilots are often “standalone” demos that sit outside core systems (ERP, CRM, production lines).

Without integration into existing processes, the gains stay theoretical instead of operational.

3. Costs outweigh benefits at pilot stage.

Standing up cloud infrastructure, hiring data scientists, and cleaning data can cost more than the small efficiency or insight the pilot generates.

ROI only flips positive once scaled across multiple sites, customers, or functions.

4. Data readiness and quality issues.

Many pilots reveal that the company’s data is too fragmented, dirty, or siloed to support robust AI models.

Fixing that problem is a big, costly undertaking, which delays profitability.

5. Poor alignment with business problems.

Some pilots explore “cool” tech rather than high-value problems tied to revenue, cost savings, or risk reduction.

Even if the model works, executives can’t point to bottom-line impact.

6. Change management barriers.

Employees don’t adopt the new tools or processes.

Middle managers sometimes resist automation if it threatens budgets or headcount.

7. Difficulty in scaling across the enterprise.

What works in one department (say, predictive maintenance in one plant) may not generalize easily across 20 plants with different equipment.

Scaling requires process standardization and investment, which can stall out.

8. Unrealistic expectations about AI’s timeline.

Executives sometimes expect pilots to yield immediate profit boosts.

In reality, AI impact tends to be cumulative and only shows up after multiple cycles of refinement and scaling.

👉 In short: Pilots prove possibility, but they rarely touch enough of the business, at enough scale, with enough integration, to impact profits. Real returns usually come only after a company moves from “pilot theater” into systematic deployment and change management.

Would you like me to also sketch a few cases where AI did translate into big profit gains (like in logistics, retail personalization, or predictive maintenance), so you can see the contrast?


Yeah.

ChatGPT said:

Great — the contrast is really helpful. Here are a few concrete examples of when AI moved past “pilot theater” and into real profit impact:

1. Logistics / Supply Chain (UPS & FedEx)

What they did: UPS deployed an AI-driven route optimization system called ORION (On-Road Integrated Optimization and Navigation).

Impact: Saved 100 million+ gallons of fuel and hundreds of millions of dollars annually by cutting miles driven, idling time, and delivery inefficiencies.

Why it worked: It was scaled across the entire fleet and directly tied to a high-cost, high-frequency activity (fuel + labor).

2. Retail Personalization (Amazon, Sephora, Kroger)

What they did: Amazon’s AI-driven recommendation engine is deeply integrated into the shopping experience. Brick-and-mortar retailers like Sephora use AI for personalized promotions and product recommendations.

Impact: Recommendation engines reportedly drive 30–35% of Amazon’s revenue, while Sephora saw a 2x increase in basket size from personalization.

Why it worked: The AI is core to the customer journey (not an add-on) and directly boosts revenue per customer.

3. Predictive Maintenance (GE, Siemens, Airlines)

What they did: Airlines and industrial firms use AI to predict equipment failures (e.g., jet engines, turbines, locomotives).

Impact: Major reductions in downtime (costly for airlines at ~$10k+ per hour per plane). GE estimated billions in potential savings for its industrial clients.

Why it worked: Maintenance is a huge recurring cost, and downtime has direct financial penalties. Scaling across fleets multiplies ROI.

4. Fraud Detection in Financial Services (Visa, JPMorgan Chase)

What they did: AI models flag fraudulent credit card transactions in real-time.

Impact: Saves billions annually in fraud losses, while reducing false declines that frustrate customers.

Why it worked: Fraud is a massive, quantifiable cost center, and the AI solution is embedded in every transaction flow.


5. Pricing & Revenue Management (Airlines, Hotels, Uber)

What they did: Dynamic pricing models adjust fares, hotel rates, or ticket prices in real-time based on demand.

Impact: Airlines attribute a large share of profitability to revenue management systems, often in the hundreds of millions annually.

Why it worked: It ties directly to the core driver of revenue, not a side process.

Common thread in all these cases:

The AI system was fully deployed at scale, not just piloted.

It was embedded into core business processes that directly drive revenue or reduce major costs.

Leadership committed to the tech, data, and organizational changes needed for adoption.
icon url

SoxFan

08/21/25 8:17 AM

#540318 RE: janice shell #540298

both my son and daughter use AI in their jobs and both say in the next 2-3 years it will not be replacing workers but eliminating jobs. Finance, programmers, and consulting in their companies will be hit hardest.
icon url

fuagf

08/21/25 7:35 PM

#540408 RE: janice shell #540298

Is good to have the AI pro-con debate going on here. You both know there are pluses and minuses, i just
hope the Australian government is more aware of the minuses now than others have been in the past.

Weizenbaum’s nightmares: how the inventor of the first chatbot turned against AI
"I think naming an AI bot after Eliza Dolittle is too clever by half."
[...]
[INSERT: Sydney scientists who said no to Microsoft, USA's offer of millions. Apparently the two turned
down millions of dollars in their choice to stick to doing it more on their own going forward.
[...] Hope this helps: How to avoid algorithmic decision-making mistakes: lessons from the Robodebt debacle
"Robo-debt disgrace shows why AI cannot replace important jobs
"A.I. has a discrimination problem. In banking, the consequences can be severe
"[...] Robodebt was an AI ethics disaster"""
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175594149
Also, i added some search links to the original, for those who also may
be interested in further understanding of the world we're headed into. wink
Emergence Quantum: a commercial quantum research 'special ops' team
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=176234240]


https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=176580517

Thanks to both of you.