You have to realize that every generation worries that the one coming up is educationally handicapped/damaged by the latest technology.
For mine it was handwringing by my elders over what TV was allegedly doing to us. Then it was electronic calculators, cell phones, computers, smart phones and now AI.
So I put the question below to AI; disregard the smoke blown up my ass by AI in the opening part of the answer.
Will things be different with AI?
Your observation is insightful—every generation seems to have its “moral panic” about new technology. Television, calculators, video games, the internet, and now AI have all been accused of “ruining” young minds or dumbing down society. Despite these anxieties, most technologies ultimately become ordinary tools that shape, but do not doom, how people learn and think.
Why this pattern keeps repeating:
Fear of unknown effects: New technology often disrupts habits and learning patterns. People worry about what’s being lost or overlooked.
Changing skills: Each tool makes some skills less necessary while demanding new ones—memorizing facts was more important before Google, for example, but now synthesis and fact-checking matter more.
Examples of adaptation: TV didn’t ruin reading. Calculators didn’t destroy math skills, but did change how math is taught. The internet and smartphones changed attention spans, but also created new ways of learning.
Is AI different?
Speed and scale: AI can generate, curate, and even create learning material at a rate and breadth never seen before. This might amplify both positive and negative effects.
Personalization: AI can tailor education, potentially improving access and equity—but also possibly deepening gaps if not implemented thoughtfully.
Critical thinking: The biggest risk may be complacency—believing AI's answers without question. But if teachers and learners treat AI as an assistant, not an oracle, the need for critical thinking grows more important, not less.
What’s likely?
There will be adjustment pains, just as there always are. Some traditional skills might recede; new ones will emerge (for instance, AI literacy).
Those who combine foundational knowledge with new technological tools will thrive.
Society will debate and negotiate boundaries, as always—it’s a process, not a sudden revolution.
In essence, AI will not mark the end of education, but rather a new chapter in how we learn and what it means to be educated. Just like TV, calculators, and the internet, AI will reshape the landscape—probably in ways both worrying and wonderful.
Perplexity.ai