I'll just throw that straight into the "I'm not a racist, but..." pile with all the other self incriminating tells and dog whistles out there in the world, shall I!? Excuse me if I am misinterpreting... This may not be actually what you are SAYING! (your keyboard may have slipped... happens to the best of us!) But what I am HEARING is that if PS was a man , you'd give a 'square go' and 'have at it' with your righteous indignation. But upon learning the details of her biological sex (from someone pointing out that you may have unintentionally caused offence by dint of naive innate assumptions) , you have instead concluded that additional allowance should be made for understandable and therefore excusable irrationality? Let me circle this a few times to get a good look at it. It looks like misogyny. Let me get up close and sniff it... It certainly smells like misogyny. But to be sure, I would probably need to consult an expert. When it comes to the subjects of misogyny, hotheadedness, tantrums and irrationality I can think of no greater exemplar of all of these traits than the example offered by the current POTUS and Commander in Chief of the United States of America. And I would like to take the opportunity for those in any doubt to point out that the present incumbent of that role identifies as male. He's a busy man (those gold tournaments won't play themselves!) and may not be able to spare the time for such deliberations. But another individual possessed of all those epithets is a certain Keith Berman. And he has time aplenty. (Several years he could probably spare on such deliberations.) And he also identifies and male IIRC. Now what was your point, caller!?