Replies to post #536948 on Tornado Alley (PROG)

[janice shell]

Worth reading:

U.S. Science and Scientific American Have Weathered Attacks Before and Won

Federal officials seized 3,000 copies of Scientific American in 1950 in a “red scare” era of attacks on science. The move backfired and offers lessons for today

BY DAN VERGANO

https://removepaywalls.com/https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/u-s-science-has-weathered-attacks-before-and-won/

[fuagf]

Well, for mine again he is on a very thin thread. I'm limited to one post a day by a guy who for a long time i saw as a friend for doing nothing but posting positives on his board. I've suggested to B402, with no change in approach by him 3-4 posts a day would be more than enough, all to some relative piece for a short time then resumption of the same old ultra-partisan, equivocating, hypocritical unsubstantiated super-partisan dribble comes again. His anti-dem crap is an obsession.

[B402]

Hartmann Report – Bias and Credibility

The Hartmann Report is generally considered left-biased due to its consistent promotion of progressive viewpoints and strong criticism of conservative policies. It utilizes loaded language and may omit counterarguments, which can lead to a highly opinionated tone. Additionally, it has been rated as hyper-partisan left by Ad Fontes Media, indicating a strong left-leaning bias in its reporting. Overall, while it cites credible sources, its commentary often emphasizes progressive interpretations and outcomes.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/hartmann-report-bias-and-credibility/

https://adfontesmedia.com/hartmann-report-bias-and-reliability/