Your right Dew, as is the NYT piece. So that brings us back to INSM management. If Iplex isn't really superior to Increllex, then why did they pursue this path? If they thought they could defeat the injunction, patents, etc. they wouldn't have struck this sort of deal. Obviously they didn't like their chances. A little late in the game to come to this realizaton, no?
I hope they have some very good data regarding some other indications quickly. Otherwise this is quite a set-back, unfortunately.
I guess I'm addressing my own misgivings out loud. But thanks for your views again.
Regards, SC