Replies to post #533912 on Tornado Alley (PROG)

[fuagf]

B402, Remember when you insisted you were a political independent, then for a time you dropped stating that and merely pretended you were. Now at least you appear to have dropped that pretence, which isn't really a plus for you but simply a fact. That said you should know this

How 'Dr. Phil' suddenly became so outspoken about immigration
Phil McGraw, who accompanied ICE agents during raids around Chicago,
has become a vocal supporter of Trump’s immigration positions.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/dr-phil-immigration-ice-raids-rcna189691

about the Dr. Phil who so strongly now defends all the illegality
which Trump's immigration people have been involved in.

and Jake Tapper

Jake Tapper says the reason he doesn't go after Trump is because his issues are more about personality and not cognitive decline. @gtconway.bsky.social

— Mueller, She Wrote (@muellershewrote.com) 2025-06-17T17:19:08.572Z

.

Not only that, but hey Dr. Phil, and B402..

As Trump pledges mass deportation, he’s creating more undocumented people
More than 1 million people who were granted legal entry to the country under different
programs are now considered here illegally by the Trump administration.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/trump-deportation-undocumented-immigrants-policy-change-rcna213356

You are welcome to the Trump apologists (on that interview anyway) Tapper and McGraw, i personally am a much bigger fan of the rule of law:

Federal judge halts indiscriminate immigration stops in Los Angeles and beyond
[...]
In her ruling, Frimpong said she found a sufficient amount of evidence that agents were using race, language, a person’s vocation or the location they are at, such a carwash, Home Depot, swap meet or row of street vendors, to form “reasonable suspicion” — the legal standard needed to detain someone. Frimpong said the reliance on those factors, either alone or in combination does not meet the requirements of the Fourth Amendment.

“What the federal government would have this Court believe in the face of a mountain of evidence presented in this case is that none of this is actually happening,” she said.

Frimpong ordered federal agents not to use those factors to establish reasonable suspicion to detain people. And that all those in custody at a downtown detention facility known as B-18 must be given 24-hour access to lawyers and a confidential phone line.

U.S. Atty. Bill Essayli, who has brought charges against protesters at the raids, blasted the ruling on X.

“We strongly disagree with the allegations in the lawsuit and maintain that our agents have never detained individuals without proper legal justification,” he wrote. “Our federal agents will continue to enforce the law and abide by the U.S. Constitution.”

The ruling came at a particularly fraught moment as details of the largest work-site enforcement raid since the crackdown began to emerge.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=176430105

In fact, parts of McGraw's comment there directly contradict what Judge Frimpong the evidence says.