News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Krombacher

07/04/25 5:33 PM

#365355 RE: ssc #365354

ssc,

You’ve sprayed a lot of words here, but you’ll get a response to the actual points—on my timeline, not yours.

In the meantime, here's the standard I hold myself to: claims require context, citations, and clarity. You want to prove “intent to deceive”? Great—bring direct quotes, full context, and actual links. Not just cherry-picked phrases and emotional outbursts.

Until then, your accusations are just noise.

Let’s revisit this in 30 days when I’ve had time to gather and present everything cleanly.

—Krombacher
icon url

Peter J

07/05/25 3:52 AM

#365357 RE: ssc #365354

Homebrew, badoggy, replying to ssc's post... I think it is more than clear that ssc has issues, right?

Financial issue's almost surely.

He isn't doing this for 2 potential new ERHC investors... even you 2 will understand this...

So, imagine what the implications can be, with ssc being a stakeholder...