Replies to post #744425 on Mr Cooper Group Inc fka COOP

[ron_66271]

My Original X P1 Was 2007.

Results in $68.6 for Y in 2025.

Preferred Funding was both RMBS and CMBS.
The accumulation curve should flatten out because the CMBS(not modeled).

Please try 2007 for X1 to check the math. I also achieved the same result of $51.2 for Y using 2008 as the starting point like you.

Accumulation is 2.35X by changing the starting point to 2008 from 2007.

Thanks for your response.



Ron

[AZCowboy]

~ ND9, ol’ cactus (AZ) has ALWAY’S’ Considered the Washington Mutual’s SEC 10-K and 10-Q Filings … BOTH pre the 2008 WMB Seizure and subsequent Chapter 11’s(s) and post the 2012 Reorganization’s SEC available factual verification and the PROOF’ of the “Preferred Managing Subsidiary’s” Continued Function and Existence Substantially More Important Than Any Guessing at “How Much” ~

The Equity Class “P” Specific “Preferred Managing Subsidiary’s existence,Began To Intrigue Me During KKR’s 2014 A’s and 2015 B’ series preferred studying and the recording and payments of the $18,000,000.00 quarterly payments in Cash being paid from that particular Subsidiary … then, the same recording of the Early Pay-Off of the Run-Off Notes …

Spread Sheets allow for the input of any feel good numbers … including my own napkin math opinions … However the Trust Generated Funding has many moving parts …

This ONE Subsidiary with Cash in and Cash out SEC reporting … PROVES … the 75/25 Pushers WRONG’ as well as those naysayers that state a ZERO result … and the irrelevant and losing 2019’ filings against the approved Plan 7

… Are Agenda’s Present ? … Yes, as now for years, This SEC Filing Verification of Function and Value posted by ol’cactus is disregarded

… Matching the Cusip Numbers Rules … Period

just sayin’

AZ

[ron_66271]

ND9, Now Add 11.9 % to P2 to Compensate for Losses.

Globic 11.9%

p2= $148.8

Now recalculate.



Ron