Replies to post #15286 on Affluence Corp (AFFU)

[Hi_Lo]

Well I guess you and I have a different view on what is DD and what is spoon fed.

I'm not talking about DD (you are distorting what I posted). I am talking about company transparency. I not only know the "view" that a company should have, I also know what the fiduciary duty concerning publishing current company information and news of publicly traded company with shareholders SHOULD be.

...and job postings, as you said, is not the same as a company being transparent.

You are using a typical strawman argument.

And NOT one person saw that document

Case in point. You are proving my argument.

This is a publicly traded company. It's not a private company even though it's acting that way.

its their money they need to look out for it, not someone else

No, it's the money investors gave the company for them to handle responsibly and follow rules/laws that are in place to protect shareholders. It's the company's responsibility to publish information about its dealings as a public company with fiduciary duty to its shareholders. And being alternative reporting doesn't eliminate that legal responsibility.

[BigBadWolf]

Correct @TJG it's called Regulation FD
Regulation FD (Fair Disclosure) and Fiduciary Duty
Reg FD Compliance
Under Regulation FD (Fair Disclosure), public companies must ensure that material, nonpublic information is disclosed to all investors at the same time. In 2013, the SEC clarified that companies may use social media platforms (e.g., Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn) to satisfy Reg FD — but only if:

The company has informed investors that the social media channel is a recognized place for disclosure.

The content posted is publicly accessible, not gated or private.

The information is material and disseminated broadly (not just to a select group of followers).

& yes I'd wager all here would like PR's yet for any who have followed this company that is & always has been rare so no reason to expect otherwise