Replies to post #833634 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[MRJ25]

Well said. USG sole more than enough in this fraudulent CON-ship.

[F2Twins]

Well said: I do not speak for you. 
Nonetheless, a significant number of shareholders are aligned around practical solutions that POTUS is more likely to undertake that result in material value to shareholders. 
Proposing to cancel the SPS and Warrants makes a resolution a lot less likely (ie, near zero) during this administration. 
I sympathize with your view: the Government has made more on this transaction than any other GFC intervention. But the way forward is to align with POTUS, otherwise we are stuck with no resolution. 
You should absolutely advocate for your position, and even if I agree with some of the principles, I do not think it is practical with this administration. 
I will continue to advocate for the shareholders that are aligned with POTUS because it makes a resolution more likely, and we need to be aligned against the other scenarios being proposed: SPS conversion. 

[Donotunderstand]

Neo

Do you agree or disagree - the GOV - or in particular DJT wants say $300-$400 Billion from its hold on these companies (I agree)

Do you agree or disagree - the courts will not save us from any administration that is in the WH (I agree)

So what incentive other than big and bigger cash to reduce deficit does DJT have to "free us" ? I see none. so we can put aside warrants or SP or LP or whatever ---- but tell me - how does DJT get his money ?

I too have waited and waited. But it is clear to me - (one of no influence) - that dilution of some sort that creates cash for Uncle Sam is a must

OK - No use of warrants. Then - How do you see us owning 100% of F and F (to get the serious high price) and DJT getting his $300B or whatever ? The two truths do not live together