Replies to post #365201 on ERHC Energy Inc (ERHE)

[ssc]

All this focus on short selling you can't prove exists, threats of SEC investigations of those who don't agree with your made up bullshit, assertions about "hundreds of anonymous complaints" which you also can't prove exist and which defy logic as you claim to know who made them even though they are anonymous, and not a word about erhc deals, partnerships, or activities.

Looks like someone is purposely trying to deflect from asinine predictions about July or August delivering the catalyst to take erhe to dollars/share. What will the new narrative be after August? Will claims of collusion with "Howard" replace the fake insider info "Dr. Gus" ruse? Or will the focus remain on made up lies about short sellers and SEC investigations as the share price continues to expose the truth?

[iwondertoo]

My understanding is that a "fail to deliver" ends with that transaction being canceled. After this many years I cannot imagine the brokerage leaving one on the books and so I would also imagine thar if the brokerage continued and delivered the stock and purchase amount the delivery occurred. Continued claims of massive shorts seems totally illogical to me, sorry

[RKT989]

Krom...At first look your scenario may be true(internationally who knows) but in the USA the broker has taken on the responsibility to vet the shares in 3 days to see its origin .After that I believe the broker is responsible for any corruption or shorted shares.It therefore has to do its fiduciary responsibility in that time frame thereby guaranteeing the integrity of the markets.That is my understanding

[Homebrew]

All this from somebody who thinks there are shorts at .0001 🤣😂😅

Since you don't understand the basic concept of shorting, the idea is to sell short, then buy back at a lower price.

Since it's already at the lowest price, nobody would stay short, waiting for it to go lower than .0001

Shorts would have covered YEARS ago, thus why FINRA has shown ZERO shorts for years.

Derp-de-Derp.