News Focus
News Focus
icon url

DoYourOwnDD

04/22/25 1:27 AM

#142481 RE: uber darthium #142480

I like that you added the doubts to your own statements for us, nice touch.

almost (but not quite)(not yet)


You seem almost, but not quite, and not yet sure of yourself based on the way you speak.
icon url

ListenToTheTrees

04/22/25 1:47 AM

#142482 RE: uber darthium #142480

The repeated attempts to stir outrage over HMBL’s authorized share increase are not only tired, they’re misleading, and frankly, they ignore the broader picture in favor of cheap shots and emotional manipulation.

First, increasing the number of authorized shares is not the same as issuing them. Let’s stop pretending they’re equivalent. Authorized shares are simply the maximum number of shares a company could issue, not what has been, or will be, issued.

Why do companies authorize more shares? For flexibility. For fundraising. For restructuring debt. For mergers and acquisitions. For possible uplist requirements. These are strategic levers, not scams, and they’re used by virtually every public company trying to build and scale in the real world, not just on message boards.

“Done quietly on the evening of Good Friday”?

Please.

Let’s not pretend this is some secretive backroom deal. All filings are made public through the proper regulatory channels. That includes filings on holidays, weekends, and yes, even Good Friday. The SEC doesn’t stop processing disclosures because it’s inconvenient for Twitter sleuths. If you missed it, that’s on you, not on the company being “sneaky.”

HMBL has been public about exploring capital markets options. That includes convertible notes, equity issuance, and yes, share authorizations. If you’re shocked by that, you haven’t been paying attention..

A scam is when someone knowingly defrauds investors for personal gain with no intent to deliver. That’s not what’s happening here, unless you’re selectively ignoring the development of blockchain-based real world asset tokenization, the launch of new digital products, the restructuring of debt, and the onboarding of new revenue-generating verticals. Disagree with the strategy all you want, that’s your right. But calling it a scam? That’s lazy, defamatory, and shows zero respect for what it actually takes to try and build something innovative in public markets.

If you want to critique, do it intelligently. Ask questions. Demand transparency. Hold leadership accountable. But enough with the half-baked conspiracy theories and name-calling. It doesn’t make you look informed, it makes you look bitter.

HMBL isn’t perfect. But calling every tough decision or necessary financial move a “scheme” is not only dishonest, it’s a distraction from real conversations shareholders should be having.

So let’s raise the bar