News Focus
News Focus
icon url

louieforpar

04/20/25 7:09 PM

#522973 RE: janice shell #522972

icon url

Zorax

04/20/25 7:29 PM

#522977 RE: janice shell #522972

They don't care. They use signal because their meeting is allegedly deleted right away so there is no record. They don't sweat the leaks just screaming 'another scandal' because in hours or days the data is gone. That's why no one knows how many other meetings they've already had. The war meeting was a setup for whatever their plans are calling for, a headfake, misinformation to russia and iran who are listening in?

Don't you wonder way not a single person is in trouble EVER for this shit? Obviously not including all the head people are minions and aren't expected or wanted to investigate each other.

It absolutely has to come from the outside to clean this up, even outside of the dems.
Did the senate pass the 'save' act? shruumer pass it?
icon url

blackhawks

04/20/25 11:00 PM

#523000 RE: janice shell #522972

Yet another reason why I'm not losing sleep over an alleged lack of leadership among the Dems.

https://quoteinvestigator.com/2010/07/06/never-interfere/

You know, Napoleon said ‘Never interfere with an enemy while he’s in the process of destroying himself.’

In 1852 a biographical magazine also quotes Napoleon giving advice to his marshals:

“Then, gentlemen,” said Napoleon, “let us wait a little; when your enemy is executing a false movement, never interrupt him.”

An 1836 multi-volume history book titled “French Revolution” contains a version of the quotation that is similar to the one given in 1852. This history book dates the quotation to a battle in 1805. These words may have been transformed into the modern maxim:10

“In that case,” said Napoleon, “let us wait twenty minutes; when the enemy is making a false movement we must take good care not to interrupt him.”

So the advice does have a long history, and a version has been attributed to Napoleon for more than a century and three-quarters.