News Focus
News Focus
icon url

stervc

04/18/25 5:51 AM

#54122 RE: Aladdin Sane #54100

Hey Aladdin Sane, with your TSNP & GCAN thoughts...

I'm glad you had the same feelings with TSNP and GCAN. With TSNP, the original CEO, Henry J Boucher, was an older guy that later after the stock ran, he died of cancer. TSNP started out as a tile company. He had a little different way of looking at things as I spoke to him on the phone a time or two or so because he had closed a deal with Wayfair. I thought it was a good deal having good potential for growth, but the market felt different. TSNP had only gone from .0001 to around I think .0003 from that deal and then back down to no bid by .0001 per share and sat there for a while. He was very frustrated at the market and so was I as the only reason why I luckily kept holding was because there was no bid for me to sell. Then later the TSNP CEO had acquired 100,000,000 shares at .0001 per share back then which changed my reason to continue holding. I chose to take the risk that if he was wanting to own that many shares, it had to be for positive reasons of growth that he believed would be coming into the stock. So, I had decided to continue to believe and take the risk in TSNP because of that. In my opinion, this is the same reason of huge growth to be coming which is why the GCAN CEO has recently acquired 100,000,000 shares of GCAN as I have previously explained. Some are trying to debate if the shares were acquired at .0001 or .001 per share. Really, I'm like... Who Cares? What's important in my opinion is the fact that he has them now and I believe it is for good reason.

More important to note, I am 100% more confident that GCAN will be bringing in something much better "operationally" than what existed back then in TSNP. I have to reiterate some earlier thoughts I posted. TSNP had an OS of nearly 4 billion shares and it ran from .0001 to $1.93 per share. Later, it changed its name and symbol to HMBL and did not end well because of its dilutive intentions from the new management that took over that I don't see existing here in GCAN. I know the market was a different market back then, but the point is that GCAN doesn't have to hit $1.93 per share for many of us to be happy with GCAN having an OS roughly around 4 times lower than what TSNP's OS was back then.

v/r
Sterling
Bullish
Bullish
icon url

dinogreeves

04/18/25 10:29 PM

#54150 RE: Aladdin Sane #54100

Every ticker has its own DNA, no stock should be compared to TS*NP. "That was perfect storm" according to Sharp himself, I was in it with 15.8 million shares at 0.0072. That was just plain George Sharp factor, huge marketing campaign blasting away 3 times a week, plus the insider were accumulating before they released the krakens. The blue banner that stood out during the Bitcoin hype was that the platform that didn't even exist was going to help cross border transactions for 400 million impoverished population around the World, which set the stage for it, plus he (Brian Forte) went on Fox Business Channel only after that interview it starting losing interest.

Here is another good one, $ALPP, perfect example, I got in between 6-8 cents with 618,000 shares and it ran to 9 dollars with 110,000 million in the float, cause the company was again on their Twitter feed was sending rocket emojis, for merging with a Drone company whose tech use to work with Tesla.

The bottom line is, no stock is going to continue to go up, unless the CEO speaks and even if they speak how will news be received.

Right now this is being pumped by front loaders, nothing else.