Plus this case of breach of fiduciary duty against Calasse shouldn't affect WNFT even if Sharp loses (which he most likely won't) since this case isn't about WNFT shares or assets. The "assert claims" (NOT "asset claims") I think are about rights in the case IMO.
How could Calasse claim shares or assets in this new breach of fiduciary duty case if both previous cases already set a precendent? It's also irrelevant.
As usual some here are trying to get longs to sell using scare tactics.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
