Replies to post #520450 on Tornado Alley (PROG)

[blackhawks]

The Israelis CONFIRMED that there was no inference but rather conclusions. 'It included...', 'it did compromise a human source....'

Washington — Israeli officials are furious over the Signal chat leak involving senior Trump administration officials because it included sensitive intelligence Israel provided to the U.S. from a human intelligence source in Yemen, CBS News has learned.

While the Signal chat messages published by Jeffrey Goldberg of The Atlantic this week may not have compromised the effectiveness of the airstrike, given the publication's restraint on releasing the information, it did compromise a human source who provided the intelligence to the Israelis, who then provided it to the U.S. for targeting, a senior American intelligence official and a source with knowledge of the Israelis' ire told CBS News. They spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive national security matters.

[sortagreen]

"the chat "inferred" there were humint on the ground in Yemen"

Yeah, Happy Bottom. I know what infer means. I went to school for a lot of years, and also read and write in English, unlike you, you illiterate asshole.
-----------------------------------------------
"When you infer something, you read between the lines. To infer is to make a well informed guess"

Right. So even when you see it in writing, you can't understand what it means. Try this. The text implied there were was humint (not were... humint is singular) on the ground... or you could perhaps say the text suggested that. A reader might infer something, but text is inanimate.

I get it. Your forte is the cunning and dishonesty required to marry money. Language skills aren't really important.