Thanks LG... a couple more points..
I understand what you are saying, but sealed filings and redactions are normal part of complex BK cases..and the existence of sealed
docs doesnt automatically mean there's hidden value for equity holders.
Im trying to understand...Are not courts still bound by BK law? If there was residual value for equity wouldnt the court have had to acknowledge it in the POR. Maybe the did and I didn't see it..The POR cancelled equity. Also the WMILT Trust agreement was primarily set up to distribute proceeds to allowed creditors no equity. If equity were part of the dist. waterfall, wouldn't it have to be disclosed on the plan, trust structure or post confirmation flings?
Only certain people know what was amended...yes perhaps, but thats very speculative..If the sealed filings contained recoverable value for equity at some point it would have to show up in trust dist reports...post confirm reports.
Im trying to find some solid glue to make things stick...and for all the years and numbers and nothing to show for it...well its frustrating.
Respectfully,
JHD
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
