So you think that the judge that just sank PRKRs Florida case and got spanked by the appeals court is going to suddenly do anything favorable for PRKR? This judge and most of them were appointed because of their anti patent troll (non practising entity) belief that patent trolls harm innovation. This judge is also consideting QCOMs motion for another Markman hearing. The Markman hearing and subsequent ruling defines the patent legally. QCOM seeks to define PRKRs patent so that nobody infringes then request a summary judgement of non infringement. If QCOM wins that motion EXPECT this judge to now define PRKRs patent in a way favorable to QCOM. Then comes the summary judgement and your case is over. How could the judge possible do another Markman unfavorable to you when he has already done one favorable to you? I have actually seen this exact scenario before in the federal courts. The problem is PRKRs investors think they can actually win when that is not at all the case and they have not won in court ever (in the end). The 1 time PRKR did win back in 2013 and actually got a jury award the judge simply threw out the verdict saying the evidence did not support it! Then the appeals court let it stand. 56c is a GIFT. The stock is actually worthless. IN my opinion.
Market Data 
Markets 
