They tell lies to justify their change attempts. The only truth in their existence is their "destroy democracy" agenda, in this case to fix American elections more firmly in their favor. Their lies about the present electoral system are legendary, haven't changed over decades. Couldn't be more blatantly dishonest. Surely there must be people working on removing him as soon as possible, but since the only legal way, i guess, is by impeachment, with the numbers as they are and with the GOP being basically in his pocket impeachment could only be successful in his removal if it were set on virtually unarguable grounds. Trump's people am guessing are well aware of that so he goes to the extreme of testing his legal limits rather than violating the laws to the extent that his lawbreaking is seen to be as unarguable as the fact the sun rises in the east. Fact is that proof of citizenship is already taken care of. That is the fact that more American voters have to be soundly convinced of.
Related: That's more like it. ""Seditious conspiracy" If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both. [...]At first glance the problem there are the words "by force." Though force shouldn't have to be only physical force. And by the DOJ breaking the law governing FBI employment and by "impoundment" they are clearly hindering the execution of US laws. https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175747493
A bottom section of yours:
All metrics point to these actions making it harder, not easier, for Americans to vote. According to the state department in 2023, fewer than half of all Americans had a valid passport, and nearly 69 million women who have changed their names would struggle to produce matching documentation, according to a Center for American Progress analysis.
Kansas had a law requiring proof of citizenship in effect between 2013 and 2016. It wound up putting the registrations of 30,000 people in jeopardy – the vast majority of whom were eligible to vote.
The Center for Democracy and Civic Engagement reported in 2024 that roughly 21 million voting-age Americans, about 9% of the population, do not have a current, valid ID.
Despite Trump’s claims of widespread election fraud, federal law already prohibits non-citizens from voting, with penalties including up to five years in prison. Current election systems already use multiple federal databases to verify voter eligibility, including citizenship data from the Department of Homeland Security.
A day after the 2024 elections, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (Cisa) director, Jen Easterly – the agency in charge of overseeing election security in the United States – said: “Our election infrastructure has never been more secure and the election community never better prepared to deliver safe, secure, free and fair elections for the American people.
“Importantly, we have no evidence of any malicious activity that had a material impact on the security or integrity of our election infrastructure,” Easterly added. end of the world trump (c1fd783907da003f5164937b7546a226a9221412)
Still, Trump framed the order as a critical step in “straightening out our election”, claiming the country is “sick” from what he termed “fake elections.” He added that “there are other steps that we will be taking as the next in the coming weeks” when it comes to the electoral process.
This action continues Trump’s long-term efforts to reshape democratic participation, a throwback to his 2020 memo to exclude non-citizens from census population counts that would be used to shape congressional districts. The rhetoric and subsequent follow through represents a potentially transformative – and deeply controversial – approach to voter eligibility that could redefine access to the ballot box.
“Perhaps some people think I shouldn’t be complaining because we won in a landslide, but we got to straighten out our election,” Trump said as he signed Tuesday’s order."
In relation to the fact repeated above that citizenship is covered by other agencies, and because no proof of anything is necessary to vote in Australia i wondered what what required to get on a voting roll in Australia .. notice the only one of in here .. https://www.aec.gov.au/enrol/ . So a drivers license would be good enough, then the citizenship deal would be checked by other agencies to determine eligibility to be on the roll. Once on the roll no proof of anything required to vote.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
