miss crushie, you probably believe shittypants lie that the us gave Ukraine more than 300 billion since the beginning.
It was less than 100 billion and most of that was not cash to Ukraine, but money from your taxes paid our own overpriced defense contractors.
EU are the ones that paid almost 200 billion combined in three years. Your lies are almost as good as your hero cheeto.
Here's the real deal, they are all paying up front. From your link which you didn't read or purposely didn't mention, like a russian asset maga normally does.
I'm positive your hero is going to cancel this and keep the money in his personal pocket.
Here’s how the plan would work:
Where would the money come from?
Most of the money would be in the form of a loan mostly guaranteed by the U.S. government, backed by profits being earned on roughly $260 billion in immobilized Russian assets. The vast majority of that money is held in European Union nations.
A French official said the loan could be “topped up” with European money or contributions from other countries.
A U.S. official who spoke on the condition of anonymity to preview the agreement said the G7 leaders’ official statement due out Friday will leave the door open to trying to confiscate the Russian assets entirely.
Why not just give Ukraine the frozen assets?
That’s much harder to do.
For more than a year, officials from multiple countries have debated the legality of confiscating the money and sending it to Ukraine.
The U.S. and its allies immediately froze whatever Russian central bank assets they had access to when Moscow invaded Ukraine in 2022. That basically was money being held in banks outside Russia.