Now let's look at this logically
1. Legacy commons have to give 2.5% of THEIR return to the reorgd co
2. 70/30 was changed to 75/25 and give up nothing NOR DID they take a RS
Yet some would like to believe that in a NEGOTIATED COURT ORDERED SETTLEMENT, which REQUIRED all to be able to participate on any and all distributions, they would have us believe that the DIPS actually negotiated themselves into a subordinate position to commons and or only get to participate up to 2.4X's face and then commons inherit the estate in it's entirety of what is left............................ 2 PR 2 8K to quell message board chatter and misinformation siad 75/25 for any and all distributions, so DID THE COMPANY LIE in both an 8K and a PR and not only do it once but did it twice. me thinks not
Isn't that a tad bit hard to swallow
Also DO NOT FORGET the UW's who fought 2 plus yrs and spend several million dollars fighting AYA to maintain their positions in their PREFERRED SHARES CLASS 19