News Focus
News Focus
icon url

jay_tee

02/13/25 9:40 AM

#180420 RE: badshah #180419

WOW! You are truly a Badazz!!! You earn a lot of cool points with that post!
icon url

Alpha14

02/13/25 9:48 AM

#180421 RE: badshah #180419

Oh boy... now this sounds like a rugged meme coin.  Might get entertaining in here🍿.
icon url

Filterthenoise

02/13/25 11:33 AM

#180424 RE: badshah #180419

Seamus does really need to address the shareholders formally now.

I hope whe they do, they are ready to make it worth the wait and silence in addition to the dilutive past.
Bullish
Bullish
icon url

satter

02/13/25 2:44 PM

#180437 RE: badshah #180419

First, I do believe in legally asserting your rights if you believe you have been wrong. Not sure shareholders would have a claim yet based on what happen to the FOXO shares as fraud for lack of evidence.

However, I do feel there is merit to exploring a lawsuit that starts with acting in bad faith, fraud, on the misuse of the US Government's Provider Relief Fund Program. There exists evidence, plus the 1.2 million settlement. RNVA in what appears in substantial financial difficulty at the time, with their scheme, went to enrich lenders ( Chris Diamantis ) and insiders including Seamus Lagan himself. How were the acting in the best interest's of the shareholders? quite the contary.

In the action, the Government alleged improper accounting. The financial reports from RNVA stopped in 2022 ? so the lack of transparency I believe starts around then & could be connected to why there are no fins. A lawsuit by shareholders perhaps could consider a request for forensic audit based on evidence presented in the Government action.

Shareholders typically need to file within 3 years of the act that gave rise to the lawsuit, or two years within discovering the act. This could be a problem, but I would say RNVA said they were innocent, and it was only discovered when they settled. Obviously, a lawyer would have to be consulted.

Basically, just saying, since you said you’re not kidding about filling an action, that I would look to say the fraud, act of bad faith, followed by lack of transparency, including to now with no fins, with no disclosure about action to get of EM status stems from their conduct with the fraudulent attempt of US PRF program funds.
icon url

User-851069

02/16/25 2:20 PM

#180508 RE: badshah #180419

Seems your cage rattling got some response. Wondering if that’s impacted your willingness to bring a shareholder suit? Especially considering the current situation where there is a single individual acting as CEO of two companies that are negotiating over control, assets, remuneration, and possible merger terms? How can one CEO fulfill his fiduciary responsibilities to BOTH groups of shareholders in this situation? Seems rife for abuse, and an open invitation to the CEO to advance his interests over one or the other company's shareholders, no?

Also you’ve stated your investment thesis is that there are 100s of billions in NSS of RNVA. What is your source for the NSS estimate?