News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Grande25

03/03/07 12:52 AM

#251720 RE: plasma-man #251713

Good game!
icon url

DaFloorGuy

03/03/07 2:39 AM

#251730 RE: plasma-man #251713

That didn't say they were wrong....just that there is no reasonable chance of conviction. Evidence tanted by disclosure does not equal innocence. Jut means they can't pursue the case. They may or may not have been innocent, and most likely were not.
icon url

Jerry1956

03/03/07 10:30 AM

#251750 RE: plasma-man #251713

plasma-man, you make some very good points. I still have all my shares and plan to hold on to them, whatever some people on this board think. We sure seen to have some doom and gloomers that say they don't even own any shares in SLJB, but the are sure here day and night, what's up with that, LOL. Forget it, not selling my shares. Good Luck To All. Go SLJB.
icon url

janice shell

03/03/07 5:21 PM

#251776 RE: plasma-man #251713

SLJB could be next, it shows the OSC can make mistakes.

In that case the OSC made a mistake, all right. They allowed a witness to become contaminated, or used one who was already contaminated.

And so they had to drop the charges, though I suspect the defendant was guilty as hell.