You say, ‘You don’t sign a contract unless you know you can deliver.’ That’s cute, but anyone who’s actually familiar with innovation knows that development contracts in emerging industries are often aspirational. They involve risk, experimentation, and yes, sometimes delays. Welcome to the real world of business.
The only thing failing here is your ability to understand the nuances of KBLB’s strategy. You want to call it a failure? Fine, but then by your logic, every delayed product launch in the history of tech and biotech is a failure too. Newsflash: progress isn’t always linear, and throwing tantrums about timelines won’t change that.
While you're solely questioning Kim's credibility, maybe take an opportunity to review the contract between the parties involved. Then ask, did Kings live up to their side of things? Weren't they responsible for obtaining funding for material purchases? Did they? Maybe the Steering Committee met and decided, mutually, that both parties should solidify their positions? KBLB to ensure "The Next Biggest Technological Advancement in Clothing" was sustainable. Not just spit out, recalibrate, then spit out again. Fully sustainable! Meanwhile, Kings was given the latitude to secure the funding they are responsible for. Solidifying their position as well. That way, when the partnership launches product, all parties and products are sustainable!
Nah. Too fun to just point fingers one opinionated, emotional way. SMH
Bullish
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
