News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Agent1107

03/02/07 7:20 PM

#236991 RE: wickw50 #236989

Skeptical? Why? Are you insinuating
they did something "shady" with that
investment, and that it does not benefit
GZ shareholders in "any" way?
If that were the case, why would they
mention it in a PR?

???
icon url

prof

03/03/07 3:32 AM

#237230 RE: wickw50 #236989

wick
Thanks for the response - sorry I didn't get back to you, but night comes earlier heere than there.

As a reminder, I wrote a post about the fact that GZFX is quoted as already having 25% ownership.
Heree are the posts:

starting with my post
A reminder

"...Everard, an experienced TV producer and consultant who produced BBC's Talking Movies series, prepared the ground by securing an initial £1.1 million from US video games/DVD movies producer GameZnFlix. The American group, which has taken 25 per cent of London International, may invest up to another £13 million over the next year and Everard has not ruled out an eventual AIM float for London International if the project pays off...."

Notice the use of the present perfect:
which HAS taken a 25 %.....

http://www.growthcompany.co.uk/sector/5500/media/29614/business-channel-names-launch-day.thtml

prof

Wick's response:

prof, what scares me in that paragraph is they refer to the money coming from gameznflix, but then call the investors an "American Group"....Gameznflix is not a group....it is a corporation....I am still very, very skeptical as to the GZFX stockholders' interest in LITV...

here’s what I have found early Saturday morning:

I (prof) searched the internet for combinations of the words “corporation” and “group” – actually, I searched for “American group”, but group would have had the same – or more – results.
There are more hits than I care to read, but the one thing I came away with after reading many hits:

They refered to a corporation as a “group” when it had many sub-divisions within its corporation:
A few quotes:

“…acquisition by Jacobs Engineering Inc, an American group of companies listed in New York,…

http://www.hollandlaw.nl/?pag=3856&partid=4

“…Recent transactions
• Sale of a corporation specializing in connectors by an aeronautics group to an American group

• Acquisition by a German chemical group of the chemicals division of a French pharmaceutical group

• Acquisition by an American investment fund of a petrochemical group

• Strategic investment equity stake by one of the world leaders in mobile telephones

• Acquisition by a pharmaceutical group of a company listed on the high-technology Nouveau Marché

• Restructuring of the French activities of many international groups in the fields of luxury goods, telecommunication, information technology, aeronautics, mass marketing and music publishing…”
(lots of GROUPS here)
http://www.bakernet.com/BakerNet/Locations/Europe+Middle+East/Offices/Paris/Local+Practice/paris_Mer...

one more:
“…Viking and owns 60% of Data Broadcasting Corporation, an American Group distributing information through TV and the Internet…”
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/pr?s=PSON.L

this clearly puts the words corporation and group in the same sentence, with no problem about
ownership disparity.

My guess – assuming that there is NO problem: they are calling GZFX an American Group because it has

Gameznflix.com
Gnfent.com
Gnfdigital.com
Gameznflix.co.uk

in short, enough sub-divisions to warrant calling it a group.

It could actually be that “group” is just as proper word for Gameznflix as is corporation. I don't see how the one term must needs exclude the other.

All my opinion,

prof