News Focus
News Focus
icon url

gimmegimmeminemine

01/08/25 6:01 PM

#284613 RE: arachnodude #284611

yet it’s clear you don’t fully grasp the complexities, challenges, and unpredictable nature of pioneering something that’s never been done before


And neither does Kim as he is the one who on multiple occasions has put the cart in front of the horse and predicted tons output on multiple years dating back to 2014 including this last year when he gave himself a years time as he predicted a ton by years end. And on a couple occasions proclaimed how he was a month ahead of schedule. Yet because he has credibility issues i suspected he would miss his timeline once again, and he did.

yet you continue to chant ‘credibility issue’ like it’s some protective shield against admitting your lack of understanding.


This from the guy who doesn't think the kings contract was a failure. I understand why you would like to put the blame on shareholders but it's on the CEO. The shareholders didn't sign the contract. The shareholders weren't the ones predicting tons by years end dating back since 2014.

The reality is, credibility isn’t about hitting every estimate—it’s about making measurable progress


No, it's about both. If you consistently miss big projections, like tons production on multiple years then you start building a reputation.

Like the one Kim has with his credibility issue.

If Kim truly lacked credibility, you—and your "not the only one" crowd—wouldn’t still be here.


Well, he does and we are.

The real credibility issue here isn’t with Kim Thompson—it’s with


No, it's definitely Kim but you have lost alot of it recently. It's ok to admit things failed, like the kings contract. And it's OK to admit Kim's credibility might not be up to par.

Don't worry, it won't sink the company if you acknowledge it.