Replies to post #233808 on Cytodyn Inc (CYDY)

[theswordman]

Never said I was fan either.

Pestell lies AND nodder lies--thats what you meant--correct??

Was definite around then--as were you--correct??

Did you want to discuss the SEC filed correspondence where nodder was trying to do that acquisition without informing shareholders??

OR--did you want to discuss the SEC filed docs that show EXACTLY what is and what is NOT included/excluded in the acquisition--as far as the IP, the lab,office contents etc?? Sure you know--there is NO prostate test included

Ever notice how odd it is--from you or MANY others. There is ZERO blame on nodder and or board--for ANY level of DD as far as "whats in the box". No blame for the structure of the deal. No blame for the lies about "fired for cause". No blame for the additional penalty/interest that those years of nodder lies cost shareholders. No blame that nodder presented ZERO evidence at the trial.

Then still--from some of your "cohorts"--how they want all the Pestell shares returned/yet they NEVER have ANY prob with all the millions of shares awarded nodder for that ruse. ODD huh??

So "just a guess" we were both around during that time. But we both have a diff version of events. SEC filed docs and SEC correspondence support my version. Good luck with your version of Pestell lied