Uh, not according to -- Confirmation: JD Vance is the handpicked leader of the anti-democracy movement in the US
"I think I'd rather deal with vance because he doesn't have shitface's baked in zombie nazi's. vance seemed to gain nothing in his run so if shitface chokes on a chicken nugget, I would think people would walk away from vance. Or at least enough to weaken the hold by midterms? Just a thought."
Late thought. unless you mean voters. Then again why would you expect voters to walk away unless Trump crashes the economy by doing what he said he would do.
[...]
In contrast to Trump ... Vance does have an ideology. He’s the emerging leader of the anti-democracy movement in the US
In contrast to Trump, who has no ideology except accumulating power and wealth for himself and taking revenge on those who would deny these to him, Vance does have an ideology. He’s the emerging leader of the anti-democracy movement in the US.
Vance would never have become a senator from Ohio in 2022 were it not for the billionaire tech financier Peter Thiel, who staked $15m on Vance’s election – a major portion of all the funds that went into Vance’s race.
Thiel knew what he was buying. Vance had worked for Thiel’s California venture capital firm before running for the Senate and was part of Thiel’s libertarian community of rich crypto bros, tech executives, back-to-the-landers and disaffected far-right intellectuals. [...] Thiel is a self-styled libertarian who once wrote: “I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible.”
Hello? Freedom is incompatible with democracy only if you view democracy as a potential constraint on your wealth and power.
That’s the point. Thiel and Vance – along with Elon Musk, Steve Bannon, Blake Masters, tech entrepreneur David Sacks, Palantir co-founder Joe Lonsdale, Palantir adviser Jacob Helberg, Sequoia Capital’s Doug Leone, blogger Curtis Yarvin, and others in the anti-democracy movement – believe that the only way true libertarians can win in the US is for a Caesar-like figure to wrest power from the US establishment and install a monarchical regime, run like a startup.
---------- [Insert: So there you have it, Vance is young, the tech moguls have long-term plans. NOTE: No Libertarian party has ever won an election to lead any country of the world, so one decades in the making solution of these tech oligarchs appears to be to not only eliminate elections, but also to eliminate countries. See: [...] Where J.D. Vance Gets His Weird, Terrifying Techno-Authoritarian Ideas [...]Yarvin is the chief thinker behind an obscure but increasingly influential far-right neoreaction, or NRx, movement, that some call the “Dark Enlightenment.” Among other things, it openly promotes dictatorships as superior to democracies and views nations like the United States as outdated software systems. Yarvin seeks to reengineer governments by breaking them up into smaller entities called “patchworks,” which would be controlled by tech corporations. P - “The basic idea of Patchwork is that, as the crappy governments we inherited from history are smashed, they should be replaced by a global spiderweb of tens, even hundreds, of thousands of sovereign and independent mini-countries, each governed by its own joint-stock corporation without regard to the residents’ opinions,” he wrote .. https://www.unqualified-reservations.org/2008/11/patchwork-2-profit-strategies-for-our/ .. in Patchwork: A Political System for the 21st Century.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
