News Focus
News Focus
icon url

fuagf

11/18/24 10:16 PM

#502321 RE: jbsliverer #502319

Makes sense - Data Scientist's Shocking Call for Election Recount Raises Scary Questions! w/ Stephen Spoonamore


Thom Hartmann Program
Nov 19, 2024

Stephen Spoonamore, the data scientist behind a viral "duty to warn" letter has uncovered results from an
analysis of the 2024 election, specifically an inconsistency in bullet ballots... but what does it all mean?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RJR5uQpweko
icon url

12yearplan

11/18/24 10:31 PM

#502324 RE: jbsliverer #502319

Nice thing about this is there is no statutory limit of expectations..
icon url

Zorax

11/19/24 1:37 AM

#502348 RE: jbsliverer #502319

This is something I said a week or few days ago. If mush is associated with any elective action or data handling, the election should be recounted. Full stop. He should be nowhere near it. And if any of his shit wasn't used even by midterms, why was it utilized now?

Musk’s team used this system to build a list of voters pledged to vote for Trump. This list could also be used to make a ghost-ballot voter list. ePollBook data is nearly always linked to the internet, and in many jurisdictions this link was being made in real time via Mr. Musk’s Starlink or any available wireless network. Throughout the day, Musk’s team could compare existing turnout models to likely outcomes, based on well established voter profile databases vs. the actual voter turnout coming in from the ePollBooks.
icon url

janice shell

11/19/24 12:30 PM

#502361 RE: jbsliverer #502319

That's very interesting. And of course if someone really wanted to pull off such a scheme, who better than Musk?

I wonder, though, what would happen if the Dems decided to do what Trump's people did in 2020. Would Trumpty's people start whining about it? I'm sure they would. But what if actual fraud WAS proved? That would, I think, create a pretty hairy situation.

That'd I think I'd thoroughly enjoy.