News Focus
News Focus
icon url

MrGoodBuddy

03/01/07 4:37 PM

#251329 RE: cm3i long termer #251328

GLTY charlie and I hope for you and your family that the outcome is positive for Sljb. You are correct that they do have an opportunity to show and provide evidence to counter the allegations. I hope for you and other holders that they can mount such a defense. We will see though, regardless NOBODY, including myself, Jim B (I am sure), Janice, jannie or any other wants to see people like yourself have to endure the unfortunate possiblity of losing your investment.

We all sometimes disagree, but everyone I think wants the best for all here to some degree.
icon url

Jim Bishop

03/01/07 4:38 PM

#251330 RE: cm3i long termer #251328

I didn't say what they were "preparing" now, I said doing, I meant as far as business not the hearing.

They can be good boys now, but it's what they did in the past that they cannot change.

icon url

janniebgood

03/01/07 4:40 PM

#251331 RE: cm3i long termer #251328

I don't think that is what Jim meant anyway. I think what he meant is that even if they do things differently now, by the rules, that cannot change what was done before which may have caused damage to the shareholders. For instance, if the company was actually an empty shell before when they claimed to have external assets, they can't go back now and put assets into the company and make it all right. What's done is done. Hypothetically, it's like a bank robber saying I robbed banks last year but I'm not doing it anymore and gives back the money...too late, and the damage is already done.

And of course if they have evidence of their innocence they will most assuredly present it and the authorities will evaluate it and weigh it against their own evidence.

Blessings to you as well.