Replies to post #73047 on Hiru Corporation (HIRU)

[Small Time Tina]

How in the heck is me posting a rollup of all the information that is already publicly available to all the reason the company has a promotion badge. The information is already out there that's why I added references at the bottom. On top of that I haven't posted anything like this since late September because my power, phone, and internet has been out since Helene hit. So the company got a promotion badge earlier today because of posts I made in September but the M&A has been posting information at least three times a day on all kinds of items everyday since I been mostly silent. 
Make it make sense. What part of me rolling information up into an easily digested article based on my opinion and DD is a promotion? I do not work for anyone. I am not getting paid and last time I checked I am not the only one posting about $HIRU on open forurms. 
Any time anyone posts anything postive about the stock y'all either call it a scam or you just plain got something to say. I guess only people allowed to say anything about the stock are bashers and people who say "to the moon" and "LFG!" with on context behind it.
I apologize if me taking an intellectual approach to my posts rattles your cage but some people actually appreciate my posts. If the OTC is really reading my post(which I doubt) they will see it's information that's either found all over Twitter, PRs, disclosures that they have already reviewed, or speculative statements based on my opinion of the information I see.
If you don't like my posts don't read them. Other then that leave me alone. It's my account. I post what I want. I don't go behind anyone hassling them or you so don't come behind me hassling me. Not here, not on Twitter, don't go sending people into groups I am in to spy on me, or pretend I am a basher, none of that. Leave me be. I am a shareholder and I can express how I feel about the stock I own.

[Small Time Tina]

On top of that it's 1am. I posted my post after hours and probably after most people are fast asleep. The stock has traded in the same range for weeks, with or without my posts, so go blame that on someone else. Maybe the people selling and not the person holding over 10 million shares.

[Small Time Tina]

Since you want to bring up OTC guidelines like as if I haven't read them, Let's review the article against these criteria:

1. Sponsor Identification: My article clearly states its nature as an my analysis/opinion and does not claim to be sponsored content.
2. Focus: While I discuss stock price, I also provide substantial information about HIRU's business operations and projects.
3. Speculative Language: I've used cautious language and highlighted both potential upsides and risks.
4. Performance Claims: My price targets are presented as speculative scenarios, not promises or guarantees.
5. Operational Claims: I've based my information on publicly available sources and company statements, not making unreasonable claims.
6. Future Performance: I've emphasized that projections are speculative and subject to various risks.
7. Factual Information: I've provided a range of information about the company and its operations, citing sources.
8. Urgency: My article does not urge immediate action or suggest missing out on an opportunity.

Can you say the same about other people's posts?