News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Zorax

10/03/24 12:51 AM

#495413 RE: janice shell #495407

I don't know, but was it wise to put out a list that they created with AI publicly so fast?
What about consequences. The very least giving the defense something to scream about and even possibly give them a slime avenue to screw things up.

Personally, I believe it was irresponsible to do what they did.
Smith redacted them for a reason and now he can't do anything about that.

I only hope this irresponsible act does not benefit cheeto mussolini.

One is Special Counsel Jack Smith’s 180-page brief (with attachments filed — under seal — last Thursday (Sept 26). In it, he lays out in professional detail the charges leveled against Trump, a synopsis of his actions, and a summation of the evidence — all tailored to be admissible, even with SCOTUS’s mandate of presidential immunity. And he asks Chutkan to unseal a redacted version (to protect witnesses and sensitive information).

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2024/10/2/2274246/-Trump-files-scant-7-page-brief-in-last-ditch-attempt-to-squash-1-6-evidence-until-after-election?pm_campaign=trending&pm_source=sidebar&pm_medium=web