SSC, it's unfortunate that you choose to frame every disagreement as "lying" rather than acknowledging the complexity of the situation or that people can hold differing views based on the same information. Let's address your points clearly.
1. Offor's Ownership
I’ve made it clear that my assertion regarding Offor’s ownership is based on observations, history, and logical deduction. You ask for "proof," but in the world of opaque share structures, certain information isn't readily available. My claim is based on what makes the most sense given the circumstances:
Offor has historically been heavily involved with ERHC,
He likely wouldn't allow himself to be diluted to irrelevance, and
A major shareholder wouldn’t simply vanish without reason or explanation.
It's not a “lie” to make educated assessments. When you add in the fact that the share structure remains hidden and opaque, what’s more likely—that he still holds a super majority, or that he’s suddenly abandoned his involvement without any clear exit strategy?
2. Short Selling
I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: your posting history, combined with your refusal to straightforwardly deny the existence of shorts in the past, has led me to this conclusion. I’m not the only one who has raised an eyebrow at your motives for hanging around a stock you claim to have no financial interest in.
Even in this current post, you continue to avoid answering the core question: why would anyone spend 17 years consistently posting negatives about a company without any financial interest? If you’re not a short seller, what exactly is the motivation?
3. Cyberstalking and False Claims
You accuse me of cyberstalking, yet you’re the one who admitted years ago that you followed me from a private chat to iHub. While you now deny it, the timeline remains suspicious. You joined iHub a year before I did—how could you "observe my despicable behavior" when I wasn't even on the platform yet? The dates don’t add up, and your version of events has shifted over time. This is why people, including myself, question your credibility.
4. Negative Posting Style
You say that 90% of the companies you posted negatively about were scams or had terrible management, but that still doesn’t explain why you don’t post anything positive anywhere. It’s not about being right or wrong on some of your predictions—it’s the single-minded focus on negativity that’s the hallmark of someone with a financial motive to see stocks fail. The fact that you repeatedly avoid acknowledging anything positive about any company you post on just fuels the suspicion that you have a short-seller mindset.
5. Offor Not Being Chairman
Yes, I admitted that Offor was not the chairman based on a conversation with Peter Ntephe, but that doesn’t change my view that he likely holds a substantial number of shares. A chairman title and share ownership are not the same things. Moreover, I have a witness—another shareholder—who heard the same claim from Sunny Oputa. We sought clarification, but Sunny has since passed away, making it difficult to revisit this topic further. This doesn’t mean I was "blaming" Sunny, but simply acknowledging that the information I received was incomplete.
6. Short Seller Accusations
You dismiss the short seller claims without actually addressing them. The reality is, you have a posting history that’s consistent with the behavior of someone with a financial interest in seeing the stock fall. You keep bringing up my belief in deals with Shell or Total from years ago, but that’s completely beside the point. The crux of the issue here is your motive for being here all these years with nothing but negative posts.
At the end of the day, people can look at your behavior and draw their own conclusions. The evidence I’ve laid out is consistent with someone who benefits from ERHC’s stock price staying low, and that’s exactly what short sellers do.
Krombacher
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
