Replies to post #362523 on ERHC Energy Inc (ERHE)

[ssc]

Pathetic. You are the largest shareholder of the company, you control a group that owns more than 50% of erhe shares, and the only information you can dig up comes from linkedin, a switchboard operator, and gossip at a women's oil conference. Sad that you are forced to cling to years old, heavily redacted gag order and 400 page document. erhc has done an excellent job of keeping gullible, stuck investors in the dark as they do whatever they want with assets and any possible revenue. No surprise you resort to lies about short sellers, dollars/share done deal, epic short squeezes, and fake SPV. Quite logical and understandable erhe share price has remained near zero for over 5 years.

[ponzi_implosion]

Uh Oh. Looks like violations of the gag order. Better get a court injunction against Linken In and call out the SEC / DOJ / State Courts and the Canadian Mounties on those scofflaw profiles exposing trade secrets and proprietary company info.

Top bad that PN spent his flight time to and from Africa watching the inflight movies rather then writing a paragraph or two to update shareholders.

[Krombacher]

If we back calculate from the estimated $1.6 million of revenue needed to cover annual payroll and when we realize that PPP caps individual payroll reimbursement to $100k when annualized, that suggests that you need at least 16 employees, assuming they all made $100k and obviously many of them make less than that so we're estimating far in excess of 16 employees.

That means many employees don't have LinkedIn profiles or have their profiles hidden... and the number of employees at ERHC is greater than just 8 employees as depicted by LinkedIn.

The above of course is speculation but again as always is based on a fact pattern and with the use of logical reasoning and deduction clearly presented above.

Nevertheless, it's remarkable that not one of the 8 employees on LinkedIn bothered to update their profile to new employment given the short seller's narrative that the company is about to go broke as it potentially loses all of its assets. Clearly, therefore, the short seller narrative is flawed.

Krombacher

[BearRickPunch]

Was this in some back room of a Chinese restaurant? That seems legitimate.