It was a good question, a question based on an opinion that you expressed. Why not answer it?
To reiterate: You said that "The executives here have a fiduciary duty to this company and all the stakeholders simple as that and cannot allow these assets and their development to be put at risk too much longer because of failure in this aspect of the company." That makes a lot of sense to me so I asked simply "how much longer is too much longer?
Instead of answering you inquired about my holdings, which are both nobody's business and irrelevant to the future of RSPI.
Please answer. I'm sure that I'm not the only one who would like to know what you meant by "too much longer".