Replies to post #733898 on Mr Cooper Group Inc fka COOP

[Oberthal]

With Etrade and have copiesof all my faxes to them forthe releases with proper boxes checked. Also got a distribution. Can obviously run statements from 2022 showing that the Escrows were there. Feel confident that that part is covered. Have never changed my address nor account numbers. So if I read this correctly neither LIBOR closing nor FDIC closing will affect what your predicted 0.58, XXXX. So still hoping soon means actually soon. Thanks for your input.

[BBANBOB]

YA mean LIKE those that TOUT their new CADDIES VETS and HARLEY'S OH and supper bowl tickets and how much they hold here !!!!!!!!!!!!!

LMAO you sink your own SHIP with your own words and aren't even aware you are doing it LMAOROTFF.............

"". move away from these constant' mb's and those that obviously have a need for some sick sort of notoriety""

Only little people talk about things like that and their MONEY, trying to impress their lemmings/minions

Wait till they find out the Q's DO NOT INHERIT THE BULK OF THE ESTATE and watch ya"" ride off into the sunset never to be heard from again"" BTW those are YOUR OWN WORDS,,

One would have to be a complete IDIOT to believe that the DEBTORS actually NEGOTIATED Themselves INTO A SUBORDINATE POSITION TO COMMONS

THat is REALLY A DUHHHHHHHH MOMENT

[xoom]

Hi AZ, so your gut feeling is that payments for legacy UQ/PQ/KQ should hit before even LIBOR is finalized ?
TIA

[AZCowboy]

~ XOOM, Actually Mine Is a WMIH SEC 10-K Sequenced consideration, that is More In Line With the need for the "Share Buy Back Program", "COOP's" Commons (COOP is ALL Commons), and the Original Releasing and "REGISTERED" ... WMI wamuq Commons ... FIRST' ... Bonds (P's and K's) Are Different' ~

"In essence, under federal law the FDIC stepped into the shoes of WMB and WMI, to the extent WMI owned the outstanding stock of WMB, and, in that capacity, was entitled to “marshal[] assets of [the] failed institution[] for the benefit of its creditors."

after the OTS Seizure, and the appointment of the FDIC, ... here is the ... "missed" ... forward moving legal precedence that was used;

U.S. ex rel. RTC v. Schroeder, 86 F.3d 114, 117 (8th Cir. 1996); see also Courtney v. Halleran, No. 02-C-6926, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18795, at *11–12 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 14, 2004) (“[W]hen the FDIC is appointed receiver of an insolvent bank, it essentially ‘steps into the shoes’ of that bank and assumes control of the bank’s rights and assets, including certain causes of action the bank might have against other parties.”)

=================

36,000 + and now, childish emoji guy bashers are always predictable; and consistently' irrelevant,

"I have simply been watching for the last few days, and this morning, I believed that YOU deserved honesty' ... the wmi-lt' has closed ... the misreading of the WMI reorganizational 2012's February Monthly Operating Report are wrong' ... any continued referencing to ANY 75/25 ratio distributions are wrong ... the 2019 cofeee-cup filings to blow up plan 7' ... FAILED ...

... The WMIH SEC 10-K revealed forward moving process for 2012's WMIHC to 2015's WMIH to the 2018 acquisition of a necessary loan servicer, nationstar' etc. through to today ... ARE ACCURATE" ...

just sayin'

AZ