Replies to post #2065 on VIP Investors Forum

[Werbe]

Hmm that was the point of my post, saying the the current system needs work.  Also shouldn't posts referring others opinions be removed?  Or is that okay because you said it?

[bucks2pennies]

I would think TOS would be too confining on the VIP Forum. Substantive opinions that would be considered TOS elsewhere SHOULD be addressed here.

BUT there should also be a LIMIT on addressing the issue. Expressing the matter is ONE, Admin addressing the issue as a concern worthy of discussion TWO. Admin would also be required to post its conclusion. TOS removal would only be applied if ADMIN considers the subject issue unsupportable or it conflicts with a firm previously established Ihub SOP.

Comments thereafter should address the recommended resolve to the issue, IF a poster even has an idea of a resolve. At some point Admin would terminate discussion on the subject upon issuing a final decision (keeping in mind, the VIP Forum, IMO, IS being implemented to improve member's use of Ihub) based on the consideration of posters' proposed resolve and Admin implementing a "reasonable and final" resolve. Ihub determines the services they wish to offer users, NOT the other way around. Users have a choice to be a part of Ihub or go elsewhere.

Nowhere will the individual user find the services offered to be perfect. What Ihub offers in establishing the VIP Forum is NOT only to discuss trading insight but ALSO to improve Ihub operational performance for the user... in other words giving the user a conditional seat at the Ihub management's table.

An action worthy of your attention. If VIP Forum user representatives abuse it, its intended effect will be diminished... or eliminated entirely.