I never said they were! Learn to READ, DIPSHIT! I wrote that the Co-Founders had FILED for EARLY removal of restrictive-legends (aka: holding period). I wrote, that I had NOT YET read the Judges decision on the matter (their ADDENDUM). I provided what information I had (at the time), as I wasn't finished reading the Judges ruling; in order TO DETERMINE if that REQUEST (to remove, or provide relief by granting an EARLY removal of the holding period), had been granted. GO on PACER -- LMMFAO!! And find out for yourself dumbass: Maybe you ought to be spending a little less time on iHub, & trolling all your life!
FOR THE HARD OF READING:
I recall the co-founders amended a motion to REQUEST the restrictions get lifted ALTOGETHER. I haven't checked yet but I hope to give the ruling a FULL REVIEW before Tuesday morning!
**The co-founders must believe that Trump will dump & would like to beat him to it. They made an ADDENDUM filing asking that their restrictive period be lifted. I have NOT gone through the filing to find out if that request was granted by the Judge! Trump tried to BLOCK their shares because he argued "it would be detrimental to the company". When, in reality, what he was saying is they could COLLAPSE THE STOCK PRICE!