Replies to post #95409 on ProText Mobility Inc (TXTM)

[NorthTrail]

A comment I made yesterday wasn't specific to anyone btw. Incorrectly or not I mused about a dual listing as a means for TXTM to trade in the US again even if CE isn't removed. BUT I don't know if ADRs for a TXTM on the JSE, would BE tradable here with a CE still on, as I've already mentioned. What is the 50 hectare article you are referencing, the giant Charlotte's Angel PO PR, or a pumpy article I seem to remember put out by a 3rd party almost 2 yrs ago? Thanks for posting and have a good day. IMO.

[TS1971]

Your entire post is filled with BS LOL.
the good doctor mentioned it himself many times so just stop.

As for the article you mean the one DR J RETWEETED?? and why would he do that?? how can you be this clueless?
Careful what you wish for you fool.

Once again here are the un refutable FACTS.
Management has shown no REV no SALES no COMPANY DIRECTION no PROOF OF SEED SALE PRICE no EXPLANATION OF WHY CE OR WHAT OTCM ASKED FOR ( why is that) NO COMPANY UPDATES no TRANSPARENCY no NOTHING. Which = no SHAREHOLDER CONFIDENCE

Management has a LEGAL fiduciary responsibility to its shareholders to hold a yearly update as i've mentioned several times now yet they have failed to do so twice now.


#SHOWTHEPERMIT