News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Fred Kadiddlehopper

08/12/24 1:50 PM

#252841 RE: DewDiligence #252837

My thoughts exactly. Deals implode all the time, so it's not out of the question. Nothing gained by just throwing away my hand now. I can afford to wait it out and see what comes next. Worst case scenario is already known, i.e. $6.66 per share.
icon url

IanFromSI

08/12/24 3:21 PM

#252847 RE: DewDiligence #252837

—I will not tender my shares, since there is no advantage in doing so. There’s a slim possibility that the deal will collapse if enough shareholders do not tender, and if the deal is consummated I will end up getting the same $6.66/sh as the shareholders who tender.

==================================

If enough shareholders, do not tender, there is a risk that the deal will fail. Without the deal, there’s a high probability that Revance will go bankrupt.

Assuming that its IP can be sold for more than $6.66 in the event of bankruptcy may result in larger losses for the current shareholders.

I suspect that the institutional holders have a very good understanding of what their potential losses or gains may be. … And the likelihood of the current deal failing is rather small, even if Dew doesn’t sell his shares or tender them.

Very few, if any, professional or institutional investors will act as arbitrageurs rather than locking in the current and best offer.

The arbitrageurs have already decided to risk about $6.50.

If I owned any shares, I’d sell them and move on. What sense could it possibly make to take additional risk rather than put my remaining money into a far better investment.
icon url

shareholder_boar

08/12/24 3:42 PM

#252848 RE: DewDiligence #252837

The biggest threat to the deal is the risk of the needed debt financing collapsing.


One advantage to tendering is you would receive the $6.66/share more quickly than those who do nothing.