That's right. There's a huge chasm between validation and infringement. But peeps who don't know how to think straight or logically, simply take it upon themselves to mentally bridge that gap, ie, they connect dots by drawing a line from dot 1 to dot 1001 and leave all 999 dots in the middle unconnected. Then they harp on all the validations as if that equates to infringement. Actually they double whammy in that way because it's a red herring. Validation has nothing to do with infringement. It's 2 different subjects they are falsely combining into a concept that doesn't exist. They are 2 legally seperate issues. Patents are born valid and stay valid until someone proves otherwise. Infringement is a whole 'nother thing...
All these years trying, the patents are still valid. Vplm isn't suing for validity, they're suing for infringement. But lolol, the system isn't allowing them to have a trial, over and over and over. But the insiders are allowed to create and sell all the fiat shares they want day in day out for years to the tune of millions while the shareholders all go underwater.
CONNECT THEM DOTS!!!
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
