Replies to post #199624 on America Demands Justice NOW

[XenaLives]

So is a pseudo democracy any better..
????????

[srm4u]

I beg to differ, here's why i believe it's not a communist state.................

We Cannot Let Them Win This Battle!

1) The highest authorities of the Internet demanded our webhosting company to remove our website
2) The email marketing service we used to send our emails to hundreds of thousands worldwide, suspended services to us
3) We moved to another email marketing service, who was also ordered by internet authorities to suspend services to us
4) Our videos have been removed from YouTube
5) Our videos have been removed from Facebook
6) Our website is placed on a blacklist of virus protection software, so certain people who visit the website cannot access it
7) Our website is being targeted by spam companies, so they can put us on spam lists, to prevent people from seeing our emails
8) Epoch Times and The HighWire, two major truth media, were both making a documentary about my work. Suddenly they were told to stop the production of these documentaries, and discontinue all communication with me.
9) THE WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM THREATENED TO PUT ME IN JAIL FOR TEN YEARS, IF I DON'T REMOVE MY REPORTNG ABOUT THEM

And so on.
The battle continues...
Don't let them win this fight.
We may not be silenced.

Contact David
I you have a message for David, then do not reply to this email, but write to: [e-mail]

https://stopworldcontrol.com/
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174829353

World Economic Forum

The World Economic Forum (WEF) is an international non-governmental organization, think tank, and lobbying organisation[1][2] based in Cologny, Canton of Geneva, Switzerland. It was founded on 24 January 1971 by German engineer Klaus Schwab.

The foundation, which is mostly funded by its 1,000 member companies[3] – typically global enterprises with more than five billion US dollars in turnover – as well as public subsidies, state that its own mission is "improving the state of the world by engaging business, political, academic, and other leaders of society to shape global, regional, and industry agendas".[4]

The Forum claims that a globalized world is best managed by a self-selected coalition of multinational corporations, governments and civil society organizations (CSOs),[5] which it expresses through initiatives like the "Great Reset"[6] and the "Global Redesign".[7][8] It states that it views periods of global instability – such as the financial crisis of 2007–2008 and the COVID-19 pandemic – as windows of opportunity to intensify its programmatic efforts.[9]

The WEF is mostly known for its annual meeting at the end of January in Davos, a mountain resort in the eastern Alps region of Switzerland. The meeting brings together some 3,000 paying members and selected participants – among whom are investors, business leaders, political leaders, economists, celebrities and journalists – for up to five days to discuss global issues across 500 sessions.[10]

Aside from Davos, the organization convenes regional conferences. It produces a series of reports, engages its members in sector-specific initiatives[11] and provides a platform for leaders from selected stakeholder groups to collaborate on projects and initiatives.[12]

The World Economic Forum and its annual meeting in Davos have received criticism over the years, including allegations of the organization's corporate capture of global and democratic institutions, institutional whitewashing initiatives, the public cost of security, the organization's tax-exempt status, unclear decision processes and membership criteria, a lack of financial transparency, and the environmental footprint of its annual meetings.[13][14]


Klaus Schwab, founder and executive chairman, World Economic Forum
History

Professor Klaus Schwab opens the inaugural European Management Forum in Davos in 1971.

F. W. de Klerk and Nelson Mandela shake hands at the annual meeting of the World Economic Forum held in Davos in January 1992.

Henry Kissinger with former USSR leaders at the WEF Annual Meeting 1992

Børge Brende, managing director and current president of the World Economic Forum, at the opening press conference in 2008 in Cape Town, South Africa
The WEF was founded in 1971 by Klaus Schwab, a business professor at the University of Geneva.[15] First named the European Management Forum, it changed its name to the World Economic Forum in 1987 and sought to broaden its vision to include providing a platform for resolving international conflicts.[16]

In February 1971, Schwab invited 450 executives from Western European firms to the first European Management Symposium held in the Davos Congress Centre under the patronage of the European Commission and European industrial associations, where Schwab sought to introduce European firms to American management practices.[17] He then founded the WEF as a nonprofit organization based in Geneva and drew European business leaders to Davos for the annual meetings each January.[18]

The second European Management Forum in 1972 was the first meeting where a head of government featured as a speaker, Prime Minister Pierre Werner of Luxembourg.[19]

Events in 1973, including the collapse of the Bretton Woods fixed-exchange rate mechanism and the Yom Kippur War, saw the annual meeting expand its focus from management to economic and social issues, and, for the first time, political leaders were invited to the annual meeting in January 1974.[20]

Through the forum's first decade, it maintained a playful atmosphere, with many members skiing and participating in evening events. Appraising the 1981 event, one attendee noted that "the forum offers a delightful vacation on the expense account."[21]

Political leaders soon began to use the annual meeting as venue for promoting their interests. The Davos Declaration was signed in 1988 by Greece and Turkey, helping them turn back from the brink of war. In 1992, South African President F. W. de Klerk met with Nelson Mandela and Chief Mangosuthu Buthelezi at the annual meeting, their first joint appearance outside South Africa. At the 1994 annual meeting, Israeli Foreign Minister Shimon Peres and PLO chairman Yasser Arafat reached a draft agreement on Gaza and Jericho.[22]

After 9/11, the WEF was held in the U.S., in New York City, for the first time.[23][24] And in January 2003, U.S. Secretary of State Powell went to the forum to drum up sympathy for the global war on terrorism and the U.S.'s impending invasion of Iraq.[24][25]

In October 2004, the World Economic Forum gained attention through the resignation of its CEO[26] and executive director José María Figueres over the undeclared receipt of more than US$900,000 in consultancy fees from the French telecommunications firm Alcatel.[27] Transparency International highlighted this incident in their Global Corruption Report two years later in 2006.[28]

In January 2006, the WEF published an article in its Global Agenda magazine titled "Boycott Israel", which was distributed to all 2,340 participants of the annual meeting.[29] Following the publication, Klaus Schwab described the publication as "an unacceptable failure in the editorial process".[30]

In late 2015, the invitation was extended to include a North Korean delegation for the 2016 WEF, "in view of positive signs coming out of the country", the WEF organizers noted. North Korea has not been attending the WEF since 1998. The invitation was accepted.[31] However, WEF revoked the invitation on 13 January 2016, after the 6 January 2016 North Korean nuclear test, and the country's attendance was made subject to "existing and possible forthcoming sanctions".[32][33] Despite protests by North Korea calling the decision by the WEF managing board a "sudden and irresponsible" move, the WEF committee maintained the exclusion because "under these circumstances there would be no opportunity for international dialogue".[34]

In 2017, the WEF in Davos attracted considerable attention when, for the first time, a head of state from the People's Republic of China was present at the alpine resort. With the backdrop of Brexit, an incoming protectionist US administration and significant pressures on free trade zones and trade agreements, Paramount leader Xi Jinping defended the global economic scheme, and portrayed China as a responsible nation and a leader for environmental causes. He sharply rebuked the current populist movements that would introduce tariffs and hinder global commerce, warning that such protectionism could foster isolation and reduced economic opportunity.[35]

In 2018, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi gave the keynote speech, becoming the first head of government from India to deliver the inaugural keynote for the annual plenary at Davos. Modi highlighted global warming (climate change), terrorism and protectionism as the three major global challenges, and expressed confidence that they can be tackled with collective effort.[36]

In 2019, Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro gave the keynote address at the plenary session of the conference. On his first international trip to Davos, he emphasized liberal economic policies despite his populist agenda, and attempted to reassure the world that Brazil is a protector of the rain forest while utilizing its resources for food production and export. He stated that "his government will seek to better integrate Brazil into the world by mainstreaming international best practices, such as those adopted and promoted by the OECD".[37] Environmental concerns like extreme weather events, and the failure of climate change mitigation and adaptation were among the top-ranking global risks expressed by WEF attendees.[38] On June 13, 2019, the WEF and the United Nations signed a "Strategic Partnership Framework" in order to "jointly accelerate the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development."[39]

The 2021 World Economic Forum was due to be held from 17 to 20 August in Singapore.[40][41][42] However, on 17 May the Forum was cancelled; with a new meeting to take place in the first half of 2022 instead with a final location and date to be determined later in 2021.[43]

In late December 2021, the World Economic Forum said in a release that pandemic conditions had made it extremely difficult to stage a global in-person meeting the following month; transmissibility of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant and its impact on travel and mobility had made deferral necessary, with the meeting in Davos eventually rescheduled for 22 to 26 May 2022.[44][45]

Topics in the 2022 annual meeting included the Russian invasion of Ukraine, climate change, energy insecurity and inflation. Ukraine's president Volodymyr Zelenskyy gave a special address at the meeting,[46] thanking the global community for its efforts but also calling for more support.[47] The 2022 Forum was marked by the absence of a Russian delegation for the first time since 1991, which The Wall Street Journal described as signalling the "unraveling of globalization."[48][49] The former Russia House was used to present Russia's war crimes.[50]

The 2023 annual meeting of the World Economic Forum took place in Davos, Switzerland from 16–20 January under the theme "Cooperation in a fragmented world".[51]

Organization
Headquartered in Cologny, the WEF also has offices in New York, Beijing and Tokyo. In January 2015, it was designated an NGO with "other international body" status by the Swiss Federal Government under the Swiss Host-State Act.[52]

On 10 October 2016, the WEF announced the opening of its new Center for the Fourth Industrial Revolution in San Francisco. According to the WEF, the center will "serve as a platform for interaction, insight and impact on the scientific and technological changes that are changing the way we live, work and relate to one another".[53]

The World Economic Forum claims to be impartial and that it is not tied to any political, partisan, or national interests. Until 2012, it had observer status with the United Nations Economic and Social Council, when it was revoked; it is under the supervision of the Swiss Federal Council. The foundation's highest governance body is the foundation board.[54]

The managing board is chaired by the WEF's president, Børge Brende, and acts as the executive body of the World Economic Forum. Managing board members are Børge Brende, Julien Gattoni, Jeremy Jurgens, Adrian Monck, Sarita Nayyar, Olivier M. Schwab, Saadia Zahidi, and Alois Zwinggi.[55]

Board of trustees
The WEF is chaired by founder and executive chairman Professor Klaus Schwab and is guided by a board of trustees that is made up of leaders from business, politics, academia and civil society.

As of 2024, the board of trustees is composed of: Queen Rania of Jordan, Mukesh D. Ambani, Ajay S. Banga, Marc Benioff, Peter Brabeck-Letmathe, Thomas Buberl, Laurence D. Fink, Chrystia Freeland, Orit Gadiesh, Kristalina Georgieva, Fabiola Gianotti, Al Gore, Andre Hoffmann, Paula Ingabire, Joe Kaeser, Christine Lagarde, Yo-Yo Ma, Patrice Motsepe, Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, Lubna S. Olayan, David M. Rubenstein, Ulf Mark Schneider, Klaus Schwab, Tharman Shanmugaratnam, Jim Hagemann Snabe, Julie Sweet, Feike Sijbesma, Heizo Takenaka and Zhu Min.[56]

Members of the board of trustees (past or present) include: Al Gore, Herman Gref, André Hoffmann, Carlos Ghosn, Christine Lagarde, Chrystia Freeland, David Rubenstein, Ernesto Zedillo, Fabiola Gianotti, Feike Sijbesma, Heizo Takenaka, Indra Nooyi, Jack Ma, Jim Hagemann Snabe, José Ángel Gurría, Josef Ackermann, Klaus Schwab, Kofi Annan, Laurence Fink, Leo Rafael Reif, Luis Alberto Moreno, Marc Benioff, Mark Carney, Maurice Lévy, Michael Dell, Mukesh Ambani, Muriel Pénicaud, Niall FitzGerald, Orit Gadiesh, Peter Brabeck-Letmathe, Peter Maurer, Queen Rania of Jordan, Rajat Gupta, Susan Hockfield, Tharman Shanmugaratnam, Tony Blair, Mark Schneider, Ursula von der Leyen, Yo-Yo Ma, Zhu Min, Ivan Pictet, Joseph P. Schoendorf Peter D. Sutherland and Victor L. L. Chu..[16] [57][58]

Membership
The foundation is funded by its 1,000 member companies, typically global enterprises with more than five billion dollars in turnover (varying by industry and region). These enterprises rank among the top companies within their industry and/or country and play a leading role in shaping the future of their industry and/or region. Membership is stratified by the level of engagement with forum activities, with the level of membership fees increasing as participation in meetings, projects, and initiatives rises.[59] In 2011, an annual membership cost $52,000 for an individual member, $263,000 for "Industry Partner" and $527,000 for "Strategic Partner". An admission fee costs $19,000 per person.[60] In 2014, WEF raised annual fees by 20 percent, bringing the cost for "Strategic Partner" from CHF 500,000 ($523,000) to CHF 600,000 ($628,000).[61]

Activities
Annual meeting in Davos

A sports shop has turned into a temporary informal reception location "Caspian Week", WEF 2018.
The flagship event of the World Economic Forum is the invitation-only annual meeting held at the end of January in Davos, Switzerland, bringing together chief executive officers from its 1,000 member companies, as well as selected politicians, representatives from academia, NGOs, religious leaders, and the media in an alpine environment. The winter discussions ostensibly focus around key issues of global concern (such as the globalization, capital markets, wealth management, international conflicts, environmental problems and their possible solutions).[11][62] The participants also take part in role playing events, such as the Investment Heat Map.[63] Informal winter meetings may have led to as many ideas and solutions as the official sessions.[64]

At the 2018 annual meeting, more than 3,000 participants from nearly 110 countries participated in over 400 sessions. Participation included more than 340 public figures, including more than 70 heads of state and government and 45 heads of international organizations; 230 media representatives and almost 40 cultural leaders were represented.[65]

As many as 500 journalists from online, print, radio, and television take part, with access to all sessions in the official program, some of which are also webcast.(66) Not all the journalists are given access to all areas, however. This is reserved for white badge holders. "Davos runs an almost caste-like system of badges", according to BBC journalist Anthony Reuben. "A white badge means you're one of the delegates – you might be the chief executive of a company or the leader of a country (although that would also get you a little holographic sticker to add to your badge), or a senior journalist. An orange badge means you're just a run-of-the-mill working journalist."(67) All plenary debates from the annual meeting also are available on YouTube(68) while photographs are available on Flickr. [69][70]

Individual participants

Juan Manuel Santos, president of Colombia, at the 2010 World Economic Forum
Some 3,000 individual participants joined the 2020 annual meeting in Davos. Countries with the most attendees include the United States (674 participants), the United Kingdom (270), France (270), Switzerland (159), Germany (137) and India (133).[77] Among the attendees were heads of state or government, cabinet ministers, ambassadors, and heads or senior officials of international organizations, including: Sanna Marin (prime minister of Finland), Ursula von der Leyen (president of the European Commission), Christine Lagarde (ECB president), Greta Thunberg (climate activist), Ren Zhengfei (Huawei Technologies founder), Kristalina Georgieva (managing director of the IMF), Deepika Padukone (Bollywood actress), George Soros (investor), and Donald Trump (president of the United States).(78)

DAVOS WEF
Here’s who’s going to Davos this year



US President Donald Trump speaks during a “Keep America Great” campaign rally at Huntington Center in Toledo, Ohio, on January 9, 2020.
https://web.archive.org/web/20200628141545/https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/14/wef-2020-heres-who-is-going-to-davos-this-year.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Economic_Forum#cite_note-78

Capitalism, Socialism, or Fascism? A Guide to Economic Systems and Ideologies

This year, the United States economy has rapidly deteriorated, primarily due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Throughout the spring, the U.S. unemployment rate skyrocketed to nearly 15%. Though the past two months have been geared toward recovery (mainly through the creation of jobs), the Congressional Budget Office projected just two weeks ago that unemployment will still be above 10% by the presidential elections this fall.

It is no question that the candidates’ stances on the economy will thus play a significant determining factor come November. Until that time, be prepared for more in-depth discussions of the economy in the news, on our social media, or around the dinner table.

You’ll likely hear mention of different economic systems, economic theories, and principles—but what do these terms actually mean? Join HeinOnline as we provide an overview using the databases below. Start your trial today so you can follow along!

American Enterprise Institute
Law Journal Library
Taxation & Economic Reform in America
Types of Economies
Alongside the growth of each country around the world has been the development of a unique economic structure. Similar but never quite exactly the same as the next, each economy is made up of guiding principles that determine the production, distribution, trade, and consumption of goods and services, both inside and out of the country’s borders.

Experts have categorized economies around the world into four types: traditional; command; market; and mixed.

Traditional
Typically established by societies that are nomadic or depend on hunting, gathering, or agriculture, traditional economies base their decision-making structures on their cultural values or beliefs. Centered around a smaller family or tribe, production is solely determined by the needs of the group, meaning a surplus of goods is rare and that money or a system of currency are unnecessary. As a result, when this type of group engages in trade, they rely on a barter system.

While traditional economies still exist today in some African, Asian, and Middle Eastern countries, economists tend to believe that this system is more foundational, and will ultimately evolve into one of the other three systems.

Command
A command economy is characterized by a central authority that makes all economic decisions. Either this authority (typically a government) or a collective owns all land, and the authority establishes all economic laws and regulations, allocates all resources, and owns all monopolies. The government decides what will be produced, how it will be produced, what prices will be charged, and how much workers will be paid.

This economic system allows the government to quickly and efficiently transform its society in accordance with its overall plan. Governments under this system have the ability to nationalize private companies, assess the skills of workers and reassign their jobs, and proceed with massive projects, without worrying about legal backlash.

On the negative side, because the command economy allows a central authority to control all, it means that citizens are beholden to that authority’s plan, whether or not it is beneficial to society. This can lead to the creation of a “black market” (a way to trade goods that the economy isn’t producing) and can discourage overall innovation and growth.

Market
In a market economy, prices, production, and distribution are determined by the laws of supply and demand. Goods, services, and property are privately-owned, for the most part, and the owners have the right to profit from that ownership. Those selling a product, property, or even their own skills do so at the highest price a consumer is willing to pay. In turn, consumers look for the best product, property, or service at the lowest possible price. When the government doesn’t intervene in any way in the market (for example, via price fixing) the economy is characterized as a “free market.”

Free, competitive enterprise is the ideal system to ensure that what is supplied is exactly what consumers demand, and that the price of goods and services reflects their true value to society. The free interplay between buyers and sellers encourages the creation of innovative new products to beat out the competition in meeting the needs of society. The efficiency with which the product is created and distributed as well as its ultimate quality are also greater in a free-market economy, as businesses have a reason to be the most effective provider of their product.

On the downside, because the market economy is fueled by competition, it can leave behind those who are at a disadvantage. In this system, the market could then ultimately reflect the values of the most successful, rather than society at large.

Mixed
Most economies in the Western world are mixed—an amalgamation of market, command, and traditional systems. This structure allows countries to benefit from the advantages of each system, while mitigating their disadvantages.

Mixed economies generally protect private property and follow the laws of supply and demand, as in the market system. Aspects of the command economic system come into play when societies allocate particular industries to the government’s control, such as healthcare, banking, or the production of energy. Characteristics of a traditional economy become evident in practices such as taxpayer funding of royal families, or investment in the hunting and fishing industry.

In much the same way as a market economy, mixed economies benefit from encouraging competition and rewarding innovation. The disadvantages of all societies could manifest, however, depending on what the society in question holds most important. For example, if true freedom in the market is held most important, those at a competitive disadvantage will suffer without government support. If government control of certain industries is used to level the playing field, it could mean lower efficiency, a lesser-quality product, and slowed economic growth.

Currently, the Constitution has led the United States of America toward the establishment of a mixed economy. Private property is protected by the Fifth Amendment, and government interference in business is limited. However, at the same time, the Constitution encourages government promotion of the general welfare of its citizens, meaning that the U.S. can utilize aspects of a command economy when necessary.

Understanding Economic Ideologies
Various economic ideologies (and sub-ideologies) have arisen over the years to explain the theory behind the systems described above. These days, the names of nearly all of these ideologies have become “dirty words,” depending on the political climate of the discussion. Let’s clear the air and get down to what some of these terms actually mean.

Capitalism
Capitalism is characterized by private ownership, where owners control the factors of production and derive their income from it. Owners compete against others in their industries to sell goods at the highest possible price while keeping costs as low as possible. This competition stabilizes prices while keeping production efficient. By nature, capitalism works best in a free market economy; however, this system would naturally suffer the drawbacks of such an economy—namely, the inability of those at a competitive disadvantage to get ahead.

Laissez-Faire
The laissez-faire theory of capitalism dictates that government should, for the most part, refrain from interfering in the economy, with its main role being to protect the free market and prevent the unfair economic dynamic created by monopolies and oligarchies.

Social Market
Advocates for a social market economy prescribe capitalism in terms of establishing a free market, but while also allowing for the interference of the state for the purposes of social welfare (providing unemployment benefits, social insurance, etc.).

Neo-Capitalism
Neo-capitalists differ from standard capitalists in that they emphasize government intervention in the economy to bail out companies whose destruction would be a risk to the country’s stability.

Socialism
In a socialist economy, every member of society theoretically has equal ownership of the factors of production—natural resources, labor, capital goods, and entrepreneurship—as well as an equal share of the economic output. Based on the belief that human nature is inherently cooperative (rather than competitive), everyone in a socialist society receives a share of profit based on their own contribution, after a portion has been deducted for the common good. Meanwhile, those who cannot contribute are provided for. To facilitate the system, the government controls resources and allocates them where necessary, as in a command economy. Socialism thus eliminates poverty and provides equal access to services like health care and education, but opens itself up to the disadvantages of a command system—total government control over the economy that leads to decreased growth, little innovation, and potential economic instability.

Fascism
In terms of economics, fascism incorporates elements of both capitalism and socialism. Fascist economists advocate for self-sufficiency and individual profit, but promote government subsidies of corporations. Fascist economics thus supports a blend of both private and public ownership over the means of production—there is an emphasis on private profit, but at the same time, the national interest is ultimately more important.

Communism
Though much more than just an economic ideology, Communism promotes very specific viewpoints in terms of economic systems. Similar to socialism, a communist society allows the factors of production to rest in the hands of the people. However, in such a society, the economic output is distributed to each according to their need (whereas in a socialist society, it is distributed to each according to their ability or contribution). Communism eliminates income inequality and poverty this way, but suffers from the disadvantages of a command economy—the needs of the consumer are easily ignored or forgotten, leading to decreased innovation, slowed economic growth, and potential economic instability through the creation of black markets.

Researching Economics in HeinOnline
The American Enterprise Institute
Last month, HeinOnline was pleased to announce a new database, the American Enterprise Institute, dedicated to researching the free enterprise system in America. The American Enterprise Institute was founded in 1938 for the purpose of “bringing about a greater public knowledge and understanding of the social and economic advantages accruing to the American people through the maintenance of the system of free, competitive enterprise.” A nonpartisan public policy think tank based in Washington, D.C., AEI scholars conduct original research that advocates for free enterprise and focuses on the world economy, U.S. foreign policy and international security, and domestic political and social issues.

Users have access to nearly 1,500 titles from the Institute, covering 20 different policy areas and including research fueled by rigorous, data-driven, and broad-ranging evidence. From within the database, perform a search for a keyword we’ve mentioned in this post, such as capitalism. Refine the search by the policy area of “Economics” to find more than 100 related results, including:

Capitalism and Socialism: A Theological Inquiry
Denigration of Capitalism: Six Points of View
Market Mechanisms and Central Economic Planning – *new*
Screenshot of Topic Search in HeinOnline
Taxation and Economic Reform in America: Parts I, II, and III
For a historical perspective on the U.S. economy, check out our Taxation & Economic Reform in America series—Parts I & II and Part III (History of Bankruptcy). In April, we merged the two separate databases into one package, providing customers with huge savings by eliminating the cost of History of Bankruptcy (a value of $1,400.00).

This digital historical archive brings more than 300 years of legislation to your fingertips. Totaling nearly 20,000 volumes and nearly 5 million pages, these databases allow researchers to search across economic policies and reform, as well as hundreds of related legislative histories dating back to 1700.

Perform a search in the main search bar for the term socialism. Find more than 1,200 related results, including:

Socialism in America
Principles of Economics
Taxation and the Distribution of Wealth
Screenshot of Socialism in America
The Law Journal Library
To expand your research beyond these publications, use subject browsing and topic searching in the Law Journal Library. A number of scholarly works are available that discuss economic ideologies, analyze economic theory, and consider their applications in economic systems around the world.

Start by locating those journals in HeinOnline that have been categorized under a relevant subject. Enter the Law Journal Library and select the Subject browse option.

Screenshot of Subject search tool
Users will find the subject of Business/Economics to be most relevant. HeinOnline holds more than 150 journals categorized under this subject, including titles like Journal of Law, Economics & Policy, George Washington International Law Review, and Innovation Policy and the Economy.

Next, locate content relating to economics at the article level. Perform an advanced search for a relevant term and then narrow your search using more than 1,500 machine-learned topics in HeinOnline. In the example below, we’ve chosen to research the concept of the free market within capitalism under the topic of “Economics.” Check out the results here.
https://home.heinonline.org/blog/2020/07/capitalism-socialism-or-fascism-a-guide-to-economic-systems-and-ideologies/

now lets see what Daniel 7 reads in the bible starting with Daniel 2

Who are the ten nations that are mentioned in Daniel 2?
Bible Question:
Who are the ten nations that are mentioned in Daniel 2? Where does the USA fit into prophecy?

Bible Answer:
Daniel 2 is about a dream that God gave to Nebuchadnezzar. In this dream, Nebuchadnezzar sees a statue which has a head made of gold, a chest made of silver, a waist made of bronze, legs made of iron, and feet mixed with iron and clay. Then a stone which was made without hands smashes the statue and completely destroys it. The metals stood for five different nations. Gold represented the empire of Babylon. Silver represented the Medo-Perisan empire. Bronze represented the empire of Greece. Iron was the Roman empire, and iron and clay is a future version of the old Roman empire. The stone represented God’s eternal kingdom as described in Daniel 2:37-45.

Ten Nations
Later in the book of Daniel the restored or future version of the Roman empire is described in greater detail. We can find this description in Daniel 7:7-8 and 7:17-24. In Daniel 7 the empires of Babylon, Medo-Perisa, Greece, and Rome are now described as four animals. The last animal is a beast.

After this I kept looking in the night visions, and behold, a fourth beast, dreadful and terrifying and extremely strong; and it had large iron teeth. It devoured and crushed and trampled down the remainder with its feet; and it was different from all the beasts that were before it, and it had ten horns. (NASB) Dan. 7:7

The fourth beast is the Roman empire, and sometime later ten kings will come to power. These ten kings or ten nations are the restored Roman empire.

Thus he said: “The fourth beast will be a fourth kingdom on the earth, which will be different from all the other kingdoms and will devour the whole earth and tread it down and crush it. As for the ten horns, out of these kingdom ten kings will arise; and another will arise after them, and he will be different from the previous ones and will subdue three kings.” (NASB) Dan. 7:23-24

Unfortunately, we do not know the precise identity of these ten nations.

Untied States
Scripture is also silent about the future role of the United States. Does this mean that the United States has no role? The answer is unknown. It is possible that we are connected to the revived Roman empire in some way since scripture tends to focus more on a group of people rather than on geographical location. Scripture is usually more interested in a lineage rather than the borders of a nation. Since the Roman empire was primarily of European nations, and since most of the United States has been of European descent, it is possible that the United States could be part of the revived Roman empire.


Conclusion:
Ultimately, scripture seems to indicate that the world will have great economic and political interest in the Middle East. We see that today. The Middle East supplies oil to the entire world. It is economically important to the world. It also has significant political interest. It holds the key to peace in the world. Because the United States supports Israel there is a growing conflict between the Muslims and Christians that is spreading throughout the world. The United States could have a role in the end times and yet not be part of the ten nations that will finally rule the world. You may be interested in a more detailed study of Daniel which discusses many of the details of the future.
https://www.neverthirsty.org/bible-qa/qa-archives/question/who-are-the-ten-nations-that-are-mentioned-in-daniel-2/

Was ancient rome a capitalist society?

While there is debate over whether or not ancient Rome can be classified as a capitalist society, there are several arguments that suggest it was. One key component of capitalism is the existence of private property, and Roman law protected an individual’s right to own and trade property. There was also a large number of wealthy citizens who had the means to invest in business ventures. Ancient Rome also had a highly developed system of credit and banking, which facilitated commerce and the growth of businesses. Furthermore, many of the functions of the government, such as maintaining infrastructure and providing military defense, created an environment that was conducive to capitalism.

Summary Close
1. What type of economy was ancient Rome?
1.1. What type of government was the Roman society
2. Was Rome a socialist?
3. What was the political structure of ancient Rome?
3.1. What was the ancient Roman political structure
4. Who started capitalism?
4.1. When did socialism vs capitalism start
5. Was ancient Rome truly democratic?
5.1. Was Rome a capitalist economy
6. Final Words
There is no one definitive answer to this question. Ancient Rome was a complex and ever-changing society, and its economic system was no exception. While it is possible to argue that ancient Rome was a capitalist society in some ways, it is also possible to argue that it was not. Ultimately, it is up to the reader to decide which interpretation is more convincing.

What type of economy was ancient Rome?
The Roman economy was highly agrarian, with Roman landowners, agricultural laborers, and small tenant farmers depending heavily on one another for stability. This dependence helped to ensure the stability of the Roman Empire as a whole.

Was ancient rome a capitalist society?

Roman society was extremely rigid in the past, but this has slowly changed over time. The need for capable men to run Rome’s vast empire has eroded the old social barriers, and the social structure of ancient Rome is now based on heredity, property, wealth, citizenship and freedom. This change has made it possible for more people to participate in Roman society, and has made Roman society more prosperous and dynamic.

What type of government was the Roman society
The Roman Republic was founded in 509 BCE after the last Etruscan king that ruled Rome was overthrown Rome’s next government served as a representative democracy in the form of a republic Initially, Rome’s wealthiest families, the patricians, held power and only they could hold political or religious offices. The Roman Republic lasted until the end of the Roman Empire in 476 CE.

Modern capitalism is a system of economic production and exchange characterized by private ownership of the means of production, competitive markets, and capital accumulation. It developed in Europe in the aftermath of the Industrial Revolution and has since spread to most of the world.

Was Rome a socialist?
The Ancient Roman economy was largely based on private land ownership and slavery. This is in contrast to socialism, which is based on public or collective ownership of resources and production. Ancient Rome was one of the most powerful empires in the world for centuries, and its economy was a major factor in its success.

Was ancient rome a capitalist society?

The ancient Romans had a well-established trade system that facilitated commerce both within the empire and with other regions. Roman coinage was also quite well developed, although the money supply was not as controlled as it is in modern economies. This allowed the Romans to engage in trade with a wide variety of partners, which helped to promote economic growth and prosperity.

What was the political structure of ancient Rome?
The Roman Republic was a government that was led by two consuls and a senate of patricians. The lower class citizens, or plebeians, had no say in the government. The consuls were the leaders of the Republic and were elected by the senate. The patricians were the aristocrats of Roman society.

It is interesting to note that the records of each class were kept and that being wealthy was often not enough to move up through the classes. This would suggest that there was a certain level of social stratification in Roman society. However, it is also worth noting that there were three basic divisions in Roman society: citizens, noncitizens and slaves. This would suggest that there was a certain level of social mobility, as one could move from being a noncitizen to a citizen, or from being a slave to a noncitizen.

What was the ancient Roman political structure
The Roman Republic was a democracy. Its government consisted of the Senate and four assemblies: the Comitia Curiata, the Comitia Centuriata, the Concilium Plebis, and the Comitia Tributa.The Roman Republic was founded in 509 BC by Romulus, the legendary founder of Rome. It was a republic from the beginning, with elected officials and a representative government. The Senate was the upper house of the legislature, and the assemblies were the lower house. The Comitia Curiata was the oldest and most important assembly, and the Comitia Centuriata was the assembly of the military. The Concilium Plebis was the assembly of the people, and the Comitia Tributa was the assembly of the tribes.The Roman Republic was a democracy, but it was not a perfect democracy. Only men who owned property could vote. Women and slaves could not vote. But, it was more democratic than most governments at the time.

Was ancient rome a capitalist society?

The patricians were the upper class in ancient Rome, while the plebeians were the lower class. The two were in a political struggle lasting for more than 200 years. In the beginning, the patricians were supposed to have enjoyed a monopoly of power, while the plebeians began with nothing except the right to vote in the assemblies. However, over time the plebeians gradually acquired more power and eventually attained equality with the patricians.


Who started capitalism?
Adam Smith was a Scottish political economist and philosopher who is considered the father of modern capitalism. He wrote The Wealth of Nations, the first comprehensive work on economics, in 1776. In it, he argued that the free market, rather than being regulated by the state, would produce the greatest economic prosperity for all.

The top 10 countries with the most capitalist economies in the world are:

1. Singapore
2. New Zealand
3. Australia
4. Switzerland
5. Ireland
6. Taiwan
7. United Kingdom
8. Estonia
9. United States
10. Canada

When did socialism vs capitalism start

Is ancient greece and ancient rome the same?
Capitalism and socialism are two economic systems that have been used since the 1830s. Capitalism is an economic system in which wealth (or capital) is owned by individuals for their personal profit. Socialism is an economic system in which wealth is owned by the community as a whole and is used for the common good.

The Romans asked provincials everywhere to rejoice in and give thanks for benefactions anywhere. In doing so, they relied on an ideology of consensus, a belief in the unanimity of sentiment and aspirations among all members of a given community. By asking provincials to give thanks for benefactions, the Romans were able to create a sense of unity and common purpose among the people they governed.

Was ancient Rome truly democratic?
The Roman Republic was a complex government system that was neither strictly a monarchy or a direct democracy. It had democratic features, but was essentially controlled by a select group of wealthy aristocrats. This imbalance of power led to a number of problems and eventually the fall of the Republic.

Socialism in Italy refers to the political movement that developed during the Industrial Revolution over a course of 120 years, which came to a head during the Revolutions of 1848. The main goals of the socialists were to establish a more just society, with equality of opportunity and greater control over the means of production. Although the movement was unable to achieve these goals during the Industrial Revolution, it did lay the groundwork for future movements that would eventually succeed in establishing a more socialist society.

Was Rome a capitalist economy
Was ancient rome a capitalist society?

Both Ancient Athens and Ancient Rome are prime examples of two of the world’s first fully functioning capitalist societies. The Greek and Roman societies possessed diverse social hierarchies relative to modern capitalist societies. For example, slaves were present in both Athens and Rome, and slave-ownership was an important part of the economies of both societies. In addition, women were not equal to men in either society, and marriage and family life were fairly different from what they are in modern capitalist societies. Despite these differences, Ancient Athens and Rome were both capitalists societies in which people could accumulate wealth and property, and in which economic activity was organized around the pursuit of profit.

The financial crisis in Rome was caused by a number of factors, including constant wars and overspending, oppressive taxation and inflation, and a widening gap between rich and poor. This crisis led to the fall of the Roman Empire, and it is still a relevant issue today. There are many lessons to be learned from the Roman Empire’s financial crisis, and we must be sure to avoid making the same mistakes.

Final Words
No, ancient Rome was not a capitalist society.

In conclusion, ancient Rome was not a capitalist society. Rome was a slave-based economy with little to no private ownership of businesses or property. The Roman elite class controlled most of the wealth and resources, leaving little room for social mobility or individual entrepreneurship.
https://www.learnancientrome.com/was-ancient-rome-a-capitalist-society/#:~:text=The%20Ancient%20Roman%20economy%20was%20largely%20based%20on,economy%20was%20a%20major%20factor%20in%20its%20success.

Rome is Rising From the Ashes Just as Scripture Predicted

About 2,500 years ago, the Jewish prophet Daniel received a panoramic revelation from God that revealed the sweep of world history from his day up until a future time when Jesus Christ returns to establish His eternal kingdom. This revelation about the future came in the form of two dreams. One dream is recorded in the second chapter of Daniel, and it is a dream of the Babylonian king Nebuchadnezzar which Daniel interpreted. The other dream is found in Daniel 7, and it is Daniel’s dream about the same things. These two visions point to a dramatic consolidation of world power during the End Times.


King Nebuchadnezzar’s dream focused on a colossal image, and he had no idea how to interpret it. The king summoned a council of magicians, astrologers, sorcerers, and wise men to decipher the dream for him, but there was a catch: he didn’t tell them what the dream was about! To interpret the dream, Nebuchadnezzar’s advisers would have to perceive the dream itself supernaturally. Not surprisingly, Daniel, who had been hand-selected by God for this assignment, was the only counselor who could describe the vision and interpret its meaning.


The Interpretation of the Dream
This dream that Daniel interprets for Nebuchadnezzar is about the dominant kingdoms of the world throughout time. In fact, the word kingdom shows up nine times in these verses. These worldwide kingdoms seen in the dream follow one after the other. Daniel described five kingdoms through the imagery of Nebuchadnezzar’s dream. For our purpose, we will look at the two kingdoms that represent Europe.


The Kingdom of Iron
According to Daniel 2:40, “And the fourth kingdom shall be as strong as iron, inasmuch as iron breaks in pieces and shatters everything; and like iron that crushes, that kingdom will break in pieces and crush all the others.”


The legs of iron and the feet of iron and clay represent Rome. This conclusion cannot be proven by citing references in the Bible, but there is no way for it to be anything else because history proves Rome is the fourth kingdom. In the text, iron is used fourteen times, and the iron legions of Rome have been vaunted for centuries. Rome possessed superior iron-forging technology, and she ruled the Mediterranean world with an iron fist. Rome was iron.


Fifty years before Jesus was born, Rome took control of the world, and the Roman Empire maintained control until after His Resurrection. It was Roman rule that put Jesus on the cross. It was the imperialistic Romans who ruthlessly ruled during the days of the Early Church. They were always after Paul. They were always quelling the riots. They were always trying to keep the peace for Rome because of what was happening in the growth of the Church. Rome’s legions crushed all resistance with an iron heel.


The Kingdom of Iron and Clay
The final part of this beast is the most important for us right now. The Bible says its legs of iron extended down to feet which were partly iron and partly clay. Here is the description in Daniel 2:41-43:

Whereas you saw the feet and toes, partly of potter’s clay and partly of iron, the kingdom shall be divided; yet the strength of the iron shall be in it, just as you saw the iron mixed with ceramic clay. And as the toes of the feet were partly of iron and partly of clay, so the kingdom shall be partly strong and partly fragile. As you saw iron mixed with ceramic clay, they will mingle with the seed of men; but they will not adhere to one another, just as iron does not mix with clay.
According to this prophecy, there will be a time in the future when the Roman Empire will divide into ten sections (ten toes). As we know from history, that has not yet happened, and Napoleon destroyed the last traces of the Holy Roman Empire in 1806. At this point, there has never been a ten-fold edition of the Roman Empire, yet the Bible indicates there will be a renewed Roman kingdom on this earth when Jesus returns.


The Foundation of the Fulfillment
How could the Roman Empire be here when Jesus returns? When Daniel prophesied 2,500 years ago that the Roman Empire would be on this earth when Jesus returned, he meant it. He accurately predicted the first Roman Empire approximately five hundred years before its founding. Now, signs of a revived Roman Empire are emerging before our eyes.

Consider this timeline of European events:

1946: Winston Churchill powerfully declared the tragedy of Europe could only be solved if the issues of ancient nationalism and sovereignty gave way to a sense of European national grouping. He said the path to European peace and prosperity on the world stage was clear: “We must build a United States of Europe.”1

1948: At the Benelux Conference in Brussels, Belgium, a foundation was laid for a new organization known as the European Economic Community. Viewing unity as their only hope of survival in a post-world-war world, three nations attended the meeting—the Netherlands, Luxemburg, and Belgium.

March 25, 1957: A treaty was signed on Capitoline Hill, one of the seven famous hills of Rome. Remarkably, the agreement was called the Treaty of Rome. It brought together Italy, France, and Germany. These nations joined the Netherlands, Luxemburg, and Belgium in the European Economic Community.

1973: England, Ireland, and Denmark joined the European Economic Community.

1981: Greece joined the European Economic Community, which made it a ten-nation confederation. Prophecy buffs from all over the world thought this would usher in the Lord’s return. However, the prophecy does not say ten nations; it says ten kings, ten leaders, ten men, ten people of influence.

January 1, 1986: Spain and Portugal were added, and the European Economic Community officially adopted the goal of a politically unified Europe.

1989: The Berlin Wall was dismantled.

1991: The Soviet Union was dissolved.

December 31, 1992: The economic borders between the nations of the European Economic Community were removed.

1993: The European Union was formed. The European Economic Community joined the European Union and was renamed the European Community.

1995: Three more members were added to the European Union: Austria, Finland, and Sweden.

2002: 80 billion coins were produced for use in the twelve participating nations, introducing what we know as the Euro.

May 1, 2004: Cypress, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovakia, and Slovenia all became members of the European Union. These expanded the population of the European Union to 450 million people, surpassing North America as the world’s largest economic zone.

2007: Romania and Bulgaria joined the European Union.

2009: The European Community’s institutions were absorbed into the European Union and ceased to exist.

2013: Croatia joined the European Union.
Gradually yet steadily, the nations of Europe have come together. Rome is more integrated today than at any time since the days of Jesus. According to the prophecies of Daniel, this new Roman Empire represented by the feet and toes of Daniel’s beast and by the ten horns of the beast in Daniel 7 will have to be present when the end-time events begin to happen.


New Prophecy Book from David Jeremiah - Where Do We Go From Here? - More

Daniel describes this future coalition as a mixture of iron and clay. Iron represents the strength of Rome, but the clay represents the will of the people. This coalition of European nations consolidates different backgrounds, different languages, and different traditions. It is like a mixture of iron and clay, which does not truly integrate. You cannot mix iron and clay. The two substances remain distinct, no matter how much they are manipulated. This mixture represents an outer structure that brings people together out of their own economic fears without unifying their underlying identity.


The Consolidation of World Power
This consolidation of world power is historic in its proportions. Since the time of the Roman Empire, there has been no world-governing nation or empire. No country has been able to achieve or attain world dominance. Napoleon tried. Hitler tried. Stalin tried. They all failed. However, there will be a short period of time in the future when the world will unify under one man.


Daniel’s dream in chapter 7 featured a beast representing the Roman Empire with ten horns and a beast representing ten kings yet to arise on the stage. The meaning of Daniel’s dream was directly given to him. Here is what Daniel learned, “Thus he said: ‘The fourth beast shall be a fourth kingdom on earth, which shall be different from all other kingdoms, and shall devour the whole earth, trample it and break it in pieces. The ten horns are ten kings who shall arise from this kingdom’” (Daniel 7:23-24).


The Preparation for Antichrist
This consolidation is preparing the world for one supreme leader. Daniel 7:25 describes the coming leader as someone who will “speak pompous words against the Most High, shall persecute the saints of the Most High, and shall intend to change times and law. Then the saints shall be given into his hand for a time and times and half a time.” This ruler will emerge from the group of ten in Europe to control the European Union, and this man will become the world’s final dictator. The Bible calls him the Antichrist. The European Union’s formation is one of the conditional preludes to the coming of the Antichrist.


Jesus’ return is nearer than ever. We may not know the day or the hour, but we can recognize the season. And one thing we do know: It is a lot closer to us than it was when these words were written and when these prophecies were given. There has never been a time like this.


The Application for Today
Here is my question for you: Are you ready for His return? You do not want to meet this day unprepared. If you are not ready, how do you get ready? Here is a good word from Romans 13:11-12, “Awake out of sleep.... The night is far spent, the day is at hand.” In other words, do not be mesmerized by the culture in which you live, and do not be complacent. Today is the day of salvation! Now is the time! If you have never received Christ as your personal Savior, make that decision now. Before all these things come to maturity, the Lord will come back to this earth, and He is going to take everyone who has put their trust in Him home to heaven. The way you get ready for heaven in the future is by receiving Jesus Christ now.
https://www.davidjeremiah.org/prophecyexperience/rome-is-rising-from-the-ashes?devdate=2021-10-06

[srm4u]

It's TRAGIC! I’m Afraid To Speak Up - Robert Kiyosaki Warning (15 mins)

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=169760819

We Cannot Let Them Win This Battle!

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174846173

https://stopworldcontrol.com/