News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Warren Buffet wantabe

07/29/24 5:47 PM

#131716 RE: investtemp #131709

SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT

Means the judge decided that T Mobile did not infringe on the patents and owes nothing to VPLM. Deerballs as always is saying all is well.

I hate to say it but I don't trust that at all right now. That is the worst possible result of the trial. If T Mobile made a deal to pay royalties or settle in some way without holding a trial it would not have been a summary judgement of non infringement.

I am just pissed the Albright allowed the case to proceed this long. Why would it be thrown out at the last second. It is not right that we don't get an explanation.
icon url

drhome

07/29/24 9:19 PM

#131720 RE: investtemp #131709

Thanks for posting that. Wish it wasn't sealed
icon url

drhome

07/29/24 9:23 PM

#131721 RE: investtemp #131709

Any thoughts out there why a Summary Judgement would be sealed?

posted today

VPLM vs TMobile
July 29, 2024 00:00

Sealed Order on Motion
Document: 272

Sealed ORDER GRANTING 136 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (lad)