News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Real McCoy

07/28/24 8:43 PM

#146128 RE: iron-eagle #146127

Do you believe the rest of this letter or only the subject heading in a vacuum? This letter is crystal clear.

I don’t get what you’re doing.
icon url

Lucky77Dice

07/28/24 10:23 PM

#146131 RE: iron-eagle #146127

Yep…I agree eagle sir…it”s very clear..that pretty much settles this…Upfront gonna be a hard lesson for some here…unfortunately..
icon url

User-656209

07/29/24 6:37 AM

#146133 RE: iron-eagle #146127

Absolutely. Why would they say it, if they don't mean it. SMFH
icon url

Smattchew

07/29/24 6:13 PM

#146146 RE: iron-eagle #146127

Lol maybe they'll say this was a poor translation, too. Hahaha it's so weird, the whole complexity of $bioaq. It's either a hugely convoluted plan(s) or the world's biggest tinfoil theory and yet, consistently we see the same in conversation. If this were about salad, le pirate, mcbot, tomfoolery, and co would spend the entire feed stating the same three lettuce names and dressing types because it's all they know (or know how to say). Or oppositely, the tinfoil theory has fallen so benignly into a personal mission of "sword" fighting over the same facts but with different levels of reading comprehension and skill. Fascinating stuff, truly.
icon url

randomwalk007

08/08/24 3:00 PM

#146302 RE: iron-eagle #146127

IE- if you remain steadfast in the process, what is the recourse? Seems even the Chattanooga crew has largely flamed out- in victory. If a fraud occurred, shouldn’t a class action lawsuit be filed? Otherwise, it would seem BIOAQ is totally over. Though schadenfreude cannot explain the last several years of back-and-forth activity on this board.