Again, no one else is stating it like he stated it and there are too many other experienced, even conservative jurists that agree the 11th court can remove her. Perhaps he's now using some other legal law books or something.
Another level of observation. Just running through search results aren't bringing up how great she is handling her job. Not everyone is biased toward her, but many feel she is not being unbiased.
Ty Cobb may have a personal axe to grind against her, but almost everyone else does too?
Ty Cobb, a former lawyer in Trump’s White House, wasn’t having any of it.
From the above link further down the page...are people just after her and she is being persecuted or is she bringing it on herself.
Bombshell Report on Judge Cannon Uncovers More Bias in Trump Case
According to The New York Times, two senior federal judges reached out to Cannon. The first unnamed judge contacted Cannon and argued she should hand the case off by citing the lack of a secure storage facility at the Fort Pierce courthouse where Cannon sits, a necessity for storing the classified documents seized from Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence. Cannon refused, requiring the city (and taxpayers) to shell out to build a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility at the courthouse.
After Cannon’s refusal, Chief Justice Cecilia Altonaga got on the horn and told Cannon taking the case would be “bad optics,” according to The New York Times, due to Cannon’s intervention after Trump sued the government for seizing the classified documents, which Trump argued were his personal property. Cannon took over and decided the case in Trump’s favor. Prosecutors appealed her decision, and an appeals panel—including two Trump-appointed judges—overturned her order, ruling that she had no authority to intervene. Cannon rejected Altonaga’s assessment.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
